Uzbek Journal of Law and Digital Policy https://irshadjournals.com/index.php/ujldp <p>The Uzbek Journal of Law and Digital Policy (ISSN: 3060-4575) is an interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed periodical that focuses on the study of the synergy between digital technologies and law, as well as the potential risks and threats arising from the combination of technological advancements and legal systems. This journal provides a platform for innovative and groundbreaking research on the legal aspects of various digital technologies, including artificial intelligence, robotics, virtual and augmented reality, blockchain, big data, and more. It aims to explore the implications of these technologies on legal systems and policies, fostering a deeper understanding of the legal challenges and opportunities they present. The journal's international editorial team facilitates the exchange of ideas among scholars, legal professionals, and policymakers worldwide, contributing to the development of a global discourse on law and policy in the digital age. The UJLDP publishes a total of six issues per year, with one issue released bimonthly.</p> <p> </p> Irshad Publishers en-US Uzbek Journal of Law and Digital Policy 3060-4575 The Ethical Norms in Digital ADR https://irshadjournals.com/index.php/ujldp/article/view/289 <p>This paper examines the evolution of ethical standards in digital Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) and the experiences and prospects for BRICS nations. As ADR adopts innovative technologies, traditional ethical principles must adapt. Literature on digital ethics, ADR codes of conduct, and technology utilization in Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa was reviewed. Gaps exist in research on adapting ADR ethics for new technologies. The study's theoretical contribution demonstrates the interdependency of ADR ethics and technological advances. Practical recommendations are provided for ADR associations to update ethical codes for the digital environment. Findings indicate balancing emerging technologies with core ADR values of trust, fairness and transparency is needed. Limitations include a lack of empirical data. Further research should examine user perspectives across BRICS countries. This paper advances understanding of ethical evolution in digital ADR globally and regionally.</p> Sadokat Safoeva Copyright (c) 2025 Uzbek Journal of Law and Digital Policy https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 2025-02-28 2025-02-28 3 1 1 20 10.59022/ujldp.289 Application of Neural Networks for Analysis of Sides Behavior in ADR Processes https://irshadjournals.com/index.php/ujldp/article/view/290 <p>This conceptual research explores potentials for applying artificial intelligence modeling techniques to gain data-driven insights into side behaviors during alternative dispute resolution processes. Analysis suggests neural networks may identify subtle psychology and communication patterns from large datasets that human mediators overlook. However, realizing benefits requires addressing challenges surrounding model biases, transparency, and effects on mediation practice. If thoughtfully applied, AI could enhance mediator training and strategy guidance, while tempering too fast automation. But early adoption without safeguards risks undermining indispensable human expertise essential to ethical conflict resolution. Thus extensive research remains to determine appropriate integration of AI for augmenting alternative dispute resolution through human-centered design.</p> Andrey Rodionov Copyright (c) 2025 Uzbek Journal of Law and Digital Policy https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 2025-02-28 2025-02-28 3 1 21 34 10.59022/ujldp.290 The Role of Digital Diplomacy in ADR Processes https://irshadjournals.com/index.php/ujldp/article/view/291 <p>As interactions and transactions increasingly occur online, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) processes like mediation are adopting virtual practices. However, critics argue foundational ADR values around neutrality, consent, and confidentiality are threatened in digital environments. This research aimed to conceptualize an original framework called “digital neutrality” to provide ethical guidance for mediators and ADR practitioners operating online. The study pursued a multi-phase methodology encompassing: conceptual analysis of technology impacts on core mediation principles; comparative review of standards in existing codes of conduct; surveys assessing practitioner perceptions; semi-structured interviews with experts to refine proposed concepts; draft code development; and a test study evaluating initial implementation in practice. Findings revealed significant gaps in current training and policies addressing salient issues like algorithmic bias, privacy, security, accessibility and emerging technologies. A majority of mediators desired more guidance on translating ethical values into digital contexts. In response, digital neutrality was conceptualized as a practical orientation for using online tools impartially, obtaining informed consent, protecting confidential data, ensuring accessibility, and continually updating competencies. Duties outlined aim to sustain core ADR principles while allowing thoughtful innovation.</p> Mohinur Bahramova Copyright (c) 2025 Uzbek Journal of Law and Digital Policy https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 2025-02-28 2025-02-28 3 1 35 45 10.59022/ujldp.291 Theoretical Analysis of Early Termination of Authority of Local Deputies https://irshadjournals.com/index.php/ujldp/article/view/285 <p>The paper analyzes the practical features, legal foundation, and opportunities to strengthen the system of early termination of authority of a local council deputy's. The author examined the current reasons for terminating a deputy mandate, researched other nations' experiences, and created suggestions to enhance domestic laws. The study led to the formation of scientifically supported conclusions regarding egregious violations of the deputy ethics rules, corruption-related crimes, conflicts of interest violations, the creation of new grounds, and the implementation of a procedure for terminating a deputy's authority.</p> Avezov Dilshod Copyright (c) 2025 Uzbek Journal of Law and Digital Policy https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 2025-02-28 2025-02-28 3 1 46 56 10.59022/ujldp.285 Reforming Traditional Modern Education in the Context of the Projected Symbiotic Economy https://irshadjournals.com/index.php/ujldp/article/view/295 <p>This article analyzes the problems and various restrictive methods of traditional models of the educational system. It considers the potential of digital education and technologies in cyberspace to reform this system and prepare students for the digital era. This article discusses various approaches to innovative aspects, including augmented reality, digital reality, virtual reality, artificial intelligence, and creative platforms based on machine learning. In addition, various educational technologies are given, including legal LegalTech and STEM technologies that can be used in both social sciences and humanities. In addition, an analysis is made of how education is being reformed in different countries, and recommendations are given on how cyber education can improve the teaching activities of the teaching staff. A summary is made of how traditional and innovative methods can work in synergy to solve joint problems in the future.</p> Said Gulyamov Copyright (c) 2025 Uzbek Journal of Law and Digital Policy https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 2025-02-28 2025-02-28 3 1 57 73 10.59022/ujldp.295 Self-Defense of Rights in the Digital Space: Legal Boundaries and Forms of Implementation https://irshadjournals.com/index.php/ujldp/article/view/292 <p>This research is devoted to the analysis of the legal nature and implementation peculiarities of the self-defense of rights institutions in the digital space. The paper examines the conceptual foundations of digital rights self-defense established by Articles 11 and 13 of the Civil Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan, the legal boundaries of permissible actions, and various forms of their implementation in the digital environment. Using methods of legal and comparative analysis, the study investigates problems of determining the proportionality of protective measures, distinguishing between self-defense and arbitrary action, as well as the peculiarities of self-defense for various types of digital rights (personal data, intellectual property objects, digital property rights). Special attention is paid to technological, contractual, and organizational forms of self-defense in the context of the cross-border nature of digital relations. The research results allow the formulation of recommendations for improving legislation and law enforcement practice in the field of digital rights self-defense, as well as determining optimal strategies for the lawful behavior of subjects when protecting their rights in the digital space.</p> Eduard Egamberdiev Copyright (c) 2025 Uzbek Journal of Law and Digital Policy https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 2025-02-28 2025-02-28 3 1 74 103 10.59022/ujldp.292 The Role of Smart Contracts in Civil Law and Issues of Legal Regulation https://irshadjournals.com/index.php/ujldp/article/view/294 <p>This comprehensive study examines the integration of smart contracts into civil law systems and analyzes the associated regulatory challenges. The research investigates the fundamental nature of smart contracts as technological tools and legal instruments, their compatibility with existing civil law frameworks, and the emerging regulatory approaches across different jurisdictions. Through systematic analysis of legislative developments, case law, and scholarly discourse, this study identifies key legal issues including contract formation, performance, enforcement, and dispute resolution in the context of smart contracts. The findings reveal significant gaps in current regulatory frameworks and propose solutions for harmonizing smart contract implementation with established civil law principles. This research contributes to the ongoing academic discourse on legal technology integration and provides practical recommendations for legislators, legal practitioners, and technology developers.</p> Jаvоkhir Eshоnkulоv Copyright (c) 2025 Uzbek Journal of Law and Digital Policy https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 2025-02-28 2025-02-28 3 1 104 111 10.59022/ujldp.294 Legal Personhood of Autonomous Systems: A Jurisprudential Analysis https://irshadjournals.com/index.php/ujldp/article/view/293 <p>The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) and autonomous systems has led to extensive debates on whether these entities should be granted legal personhood. This paper explores the legal frameworks, philosophical arguments, and policy considerations surrounding the attribution of legal personhood to AI. The study examines key legislative efforts, such as the European Parliament's 2017 resolution on AI legal personhood, and assesses the ethical, economic, and regulatory implications. While some scholars advocate for an “electronic personality” model, others highlight accountability gaps and risks associated with AI autonomy. The findings suggest that AI legal personhood remains a contested concept, with prevailing legal doctrines favoring strict liability over autonomous legal recognition.</p> Nodirbek Inoyatov Copyright (c) 2025 Uzbek Journal of Law and Digital Policy https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 2025-02-28 2025-02-28 3 1 112 130 10.59022/ujldp.293 The Legal and Ethical Challenges in ESG Compliance https://irshadjournals.com/index.php/ujldp/article/view/296 <p>Companies face tough legal and ethical hurdles trying to meet Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) goals. Different rule setups across regions twist how businesses run their operations. I talked with compliance officers, dug into case stories of firms in legal battles, and sifted through tons of regulatory documents; this rough mix revealed familiar snags and some neat tricks to handle ESG challenges. The results show that a jumble of regulations not only wastes time on compliance but also stirs up ethical puzzles, forcing companies into a patchwork of responses. The issue stands out big in healthcare, where strong ethics matter most; it's plain that one-size-fits-all rules could really tidy up compliance and boost accountability. Its impact goes well beyond healthcare a better grip on these legal and ethical knots might spark forward-thinking moves for companies under a wild array of rules. In the end, the study plunges into the ESG debate, urging clearer guidelines and a real-world blend of ethics and business that weds everyday practice with the push for sustainability.</p> Nizomiddin Kozimov Copyright (c) 2025 Uzbek Journal of Law and Digital Policy https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 2025-02-28 2025-02-28 3 1 131 154 10.59022/ujldp.296