Uzbek Journal of Law and Digital Policy

Legal Frameworks for AI-Driven Cybercrime Prevention

Naeem AllahRakha — 2024-12-30

This research aims to explore the legal frameworks necessary for integrating AI-driven evidence in cybercrime prevention while ensuring the protection of privacy rights. The study examines AI's role in evidence collection, particularly focusing on the challenges of AI surveillance capabilities and the privacy concerns surrounding data gathering. Using qualitative, doctrinal, and document analysis methods, the research analyzes how different jurisdictions address the admissibility of AI evidence in criminal proceedings. The findings highlight the challenges posed by AI's opacity, the black box problem, and the reliability of AI-generated evidence. The recommendations include conducting risk assessments, limiting data collection, ensuring informed consent, and enhancing security practices. The research suggests developing international protocols for cross-border enforcement systems to address the evolving nature of cybercrime. In conclusion, this study provides insights into adapting legal standards for AI-driven cybercrime prevention while safeguarding individual privacy rights.

Theoretical and Legal Basis of Accountability in the Activities of Executive Bodies

Raxmanov Jo‘rabek — 2024-12-30

This article analyzes the theoretical and legal foundations of accountability in the activities of the executive branch. A key tenet of governance is accountability, which holds public servants accountable for their deeds and choices. This study looks at the several theoretical stances that define responsibility, such as legal, ethical, and moral perspectives. Additionally, it examines current legislative frameworks and standards that control executive bodies' responsibility, emphasizing the connection between legal requirements and real-world application. It also evaluates how national laws and international accountability norms interact. The ultimate goal of this research is to promote democratic governance and public trust by adding to the conversation on improving the efficacy of accountability mechanisms in executive activities.

Theoretical Analysis of Specific Aspects of State Control and Inspection Regarding Compliance with Employees' Labor Rights

Javokhir Turaev — 2024-12-30

This article provides a theoretical analysis of state control and inspection in relation to compliance with employees' labor rights. The aim is to examine the specific characteristics of state control mechanisms under current labor legislation. The article focuses on the analysis of four types of state control and inspection processes, identifying their objects and subjects. By reviewing relevant legislative norms, the author outlines the unique features of these regulatory measures, emphasizing the importance of effective enforcement in ensuring labor rights. The methodology includes qualitative and doctrinal analysis, along with document examination. The results highlight gaps and challenges in the current system, leading to suggestions for improving state oversight and inspection. Recommendations focus on enhancing transparency, accountability, and efficiency in labor inspections. In conclusion, the article stresses the need for continuous monitoring to ensure the protection of workers’ rights and the improvement of labor standards.

The System of International Control over the Observance of Human Rights at Work

Dilfuza Abdullaeva — 2024-12-30

This article explores the international control system for human rights observance at work and the legal framework for labor rights protection. It highlights the significance of labor rights as a vital aspect of social protection. The study examines the effectiveness of labor rights enforcement and the challenges facing the system's development at the regional level. The research aims to understand modern challenges and social justice requirements in labor rights protection. Employing qualitative methods and doctrinal analysis, the article analyzes relevant documents and legal frameworks to assess the current system's efficiency. The results indicate that while progress has been made, there are ongoing issues in ensuring comprehensive protection of labor rights globally. Suggestions for improving the international system of control and enhancing regional cooperation are provided. The article concludes with recommendations to strengthen labor rights frameworks and increase their responsiveness to evolving social and economic conditions.

GDPR vs. Weakly Protected Parties in Other Countries

Gayrat Eshbaev — 2024-12-30

The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) establishes strong privacy rights for EU residents. However, many countries, including the United States, Asia, and Africa, lack similar protections. This creates challenges for multinational corporations and individuals navigating fragmented global data protection frameworks. This study examines the evolution, principles, and extraterritorial effects of GDPR, comparing it with weaker regulatory frameworks globally. Using qualitative and doctrinal research and document analysis, it identifies enforcement gaps, compliance costs, and operational difficulties in cross-border data transfers. Findings emphasize the need for consistent global standards to address the digital divide and ensure fair data practices. Recommendations highlight multilateral cooperation to develop an interoperable and ethical digital ecosystem. While GDPR offers a foundational model, achieving global harmonization requires collective international commitment. The study concludes with actionable suggestions to strengthen global privacy frameworks and protect vulnerable parties in weakly regulated regions.

Digital Financial Assets as an Object of Civil Rights

Temurbek Pulatov — 2024-12-30

This article explores the legal nature of digital financial assets (DFAs) within civil rights. DFAs, including cryptocurrencies and tokens, challenge traditional legal concepts due to their decentralized and intangible nature. The study addresses key legal issues such as ownership rights, enforceability of obligations, and jurisdictional conflicts in cross-border transactions. A comparative analysis of regulatory frameworks in the European Union, the United States, Russia, and Uzbekistan reveals the lack of uniformity in DFA treatment. Special focus is given to Uzbekistan’s progressive approach under the Digital Uzbekistan 2030 initiative. The research adopts a qualitative, doctrinal, and document analysis methodology, supported by case studies and legal analysis. The findings identify significant regulatory gaps, particularly regarding DFA integration into traditional legal systems. The study suggests the need for comprehensive reforms to harmonize DFA regulations and ensure legal clarity. The conclusion emphasizes the importance of aligning legal frameworks with emerging digital financial trends.