The Ethical Norms in Digital ADR
Abstract views: 8
/ 
PDF downloads: 8
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59022/ujldp.289Keywords:
Ethics, Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), Technology, Artificial Intelligence (AI), Confidentiality, FairnessAbstract
This paper examines the evolution of ethical standards in digital Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) and the experiences and prospects for BRICS nations. As ADR adopts innovative technologies, traditional ethical principles must adapt. Literature on digital ethics, ADR codes of conduct, and technology utilization in Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa was reviewed. Gaps exist in research on adapting ADR ethics for new technologies. The study's theoretical contribution demonstrates the interdependency of ADR ethics and technological advances. Practical recommendations are provided for ADR associations to update ethical codes for the digital environment. Findings indicate balancing emerging technologies with core ADR values of trust, fairness and transparency is needed. Limitations include a lack of empirical data. Further research should examine user perspectives across BRICS countries. This paper advances understanding of ethical evolution in digital ADR globally and regionally.
References
Abdikeev, N. M., Eremina, I. A., & Zekiryaev, R. E. (2021). Online mediation in Russia: Development trends. Amazonia Investiga, 10(53), 53-58.
AllahRakha, N. (2024). UNESCO’s AI Ethics Principles: Challenges and Opportunities. International Journal of Law and Policy, 2(9), 24–36. https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.225
AllahRakha, N. (2025). National Policy Frameworks for AI in Leading States. International Journal of Law and Policy, 3(1), 38–51. https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.270
Chen, Y. Y. (2022). Designing ethical algorithms for ADR. Harvard Negotiation Law Review, 27, 177–236.
Du, H., Zhang, Q., Liao, H., Guo, F., & Singh, K. (2019). An intelligent dispute resolution approach based on multi-modal data fusion. Future Internet, 11(3), 63.
European Commission. (2022). Laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act).
Hartford, D. R. (2022). Ethical implications of emerging technologies for ADR professionals. NY State Bar Association Journal, 6, 30-35. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000149992
Hilbert, M. (2021). Can AI perform empathy? The limits of compassionate dispute resolution. Negotiation Journal, 37(2), 159-178.
Hill, R. (2017). Potential issues with online dispute resolution (ODR) systems. Legal Information Review, 2(1), 5-7.
Ivanova, A. (2022). Confidentiality in virtual mediation: Risks and recommendations. Russian Law Journal, 10(1), 46-67.
Jiang, S. (2022). Semantics-enhanced online dispute resolution in China. Computer Law & Security Review, 44, 105618.
Krishnan, A., Rickard, J., & Lakshmanan, A. (2021). Regulating algorithmic dispute resolution in India and South Africa. Journal of Dispute Resolution, 2021(1), 45-81.
Lodder, A. R., & Zeleznikow, J. (2019). Developing an online dispute resolution environment: Dialogue tools and negotiation systems in a three-step model. The Artificial Intelligence and Law Journal, 26(3), 287-305. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228159809
Mohan, V. (2021). Can AI disrupt the traditional ADR mechanisms in India? Journal of the Indian Law Institute, 63(2), 257-280.
Remus, D., & Levy, F. S. (2017). Can robots be lawyers? Computers, lawyers, and the practice of law. Georgetown Washington Law Review, 30, 514. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2701092
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Uzbek Journal of Law and Digital Policy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
