Application of Neural Networks for Analysis of Sides Behavior in ADR Processes
Abstract views: 8
/ 
PDF downloads: 8
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59022/ujldp.290Keywords:
Mediation, Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, Neural Networks, Alternative Dispute Resolution, Conflict Resolution, Behavioral ModelingAbstract
This conceptual research explores potentials for applying artificial intelligence modeling techniques to gain data-driven insights into side behaviors during alternative dispute resolution processes. Analysis suggests neural networks may identify subtle psychology and communication patterns from large datasets that human mediators overlook. However, realizing benefits requires addressing challenges surrounding model biases, transparency, and effects on mediation practice. If thoughtfully applied, AI could enhance mediator training and strategy guidance, while tempering too fast automation. But early adoption without safeguards risks undermining indispensable human expertise essential to ethical conflict resolution. Thus extensive research remains to determine appropriate integration of AI for augmenting alternative dispute resolution through human-centered design.
References
AllahRakha, N. (2024). UNESCO’s AI Ethics Principles: Challenges and Opportunities. International Journal of Law and Policy, 2(9), 24–36. https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.225
AllahRakha, N. (2025). National Policy Frameworks for AI in Leading States. International Journal of Law and Policy, 3(1), 38–51. https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.270
Allred, K. G. (2000). Anger and retaliation: Toward an understanding of impassioned conflict in organizations. Research on Negotiation in Organizations, 7(27), 93.
Brown, H. J., & Marriott, A. L. (1999). ADR principles and practice. Sweet & Maxwell.
Chen, M. Y., Kwon, Y. K., Leung, V. C., & Meng, H. (2003). Payment strategies over Internet: Analysis and case studies. In Electronic commerce (pp. 125-145). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24795-5_7
Cobb, S., & Rifkin, J. (1991). Practice and paradox: Deconstructing neutrality in mediation. Law & Social Inquiry, 16(1), 35-62. https://www.jstor.org/stable/828547
De Callier, C., Ney, S., & Seal, A. (2022). Can artificial intelligence advance online dispute resolution? Interests, abilities, and ethics. Fordham Law Review, 91, 2295.
Fiadjoe, A. (2004). Alternative dispute resolution: A developing world perspective. Routledge.
Gulyamov, S., Rustambekov, I., Narziev, O., & Xudayberganov, A. (2021). Draft Concept of the Republic of Uzbekistan in the Field of Development Artificial Intelligence for 2021-2030. Yurisprudensiya, 1, 107-21. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/351658151_DRAFT_CONCEPT_OF_THE_REPUBLIC_OF_UZBEKISTAN_IN_THE_FIELD_OF_DEVELOPMENT_ARTIFICIAL_INTELLIGENCE_FOR_2021-2030
Hagendorff, T. (2020). The ethics of AI ethics: An evaluation of guidelines. Minds and Machines, 30(1), 99–120.
Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997). Long short-term memory. Neural Computation, 9(8), 1735-1780. https://doi.org/10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735
Kaufmann, M., Kiefer, C., & Lodha, S. K. (2011, September). Parallel coordinate visualization of simulation ensemble data. In WSC (pp. 156–168).
Kressel, K. (2022). Mediation competency profile: Characteristics and skillsets of effective mediators.
Lodder, A. R., & Zeleznikow, J. (2005, August). Developing an online dispute resolution environment: Dialogue tools and negotiation support systems in a three-step model. ICFAI Journal of Alternative Dispute Resolution, 4(2), 8–17.
Luo, G., Stone, B. L., Johnson, M. D., Tarczy-Hornoch, P., Wilcox, A. B., & Nkoy, F. L. (2019). Automating construction of machine learning models with clinical big data: Proposal rationale and methods. JMIR Research Protocols, 8(8), e13802. https://doi.org/10.2196/13802
Morley, J., Machado, C. C., Burr, C., Cowls, J., Joshi, I., Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2019). The ethics of AI in health care: A mapping review. Social Science & Medicine, 272, 113172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113172
Nolan-Haley, J. (2012). Mediation: The “new arbitration.” Harvard Negotiation Law Review, 17, 61.
Nolan-Haley, J. (2012). Mediation: The “new arbitration.” Harvard Negotiation Law Review, 17, 61.
Opitz, D., & Maclin, R. (1999). Popular ensemble methods: An empirical study. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 11, 169–198. https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.614
Russell, S. J., & Norvig, P. (2016). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach. Malaysia.
Rustambekov, I., Safoeva, S., Rodionov , A., & Uktam, R. (2023). Balance Between Data Collection and Privacy in the Context of Smart Cities. International Journal of Cyber Law, 1(4). https://doi.org/10.59022/ijcl.50
S. S. Gulyamov, R. A. Fayziev, A. A. Rodionov and G. A. Jakupov, "Leveraging Semantic Analysis in Machine Learning for Addressing Unstructured Challenges in Education," 2023 3rd International Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning in Higher Education (TELE), Lipetsk, Russian Federation, 2023, pp. 5-7, doi: 10.1109/TELE58910.2023.10184355.
S. S. Gulyamov, R. A. Fayziev, A. A. Rodionov and M. K. Mukhiddinova, "The Introduction of Artificial Intelligence in the Study of Economic Disciplines in Higher Educational Institutions," 2022 2nd International Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning in Higher Education (TELE), Lipetsk, Russian Federation, 2022, pp. 6-8, doi: 10.1109/TELE55498.2022.9801065.
Saia, R., & Carta, S. (2019). Learning and disrupting with dynamic neural networks for sequence modelling of a time series. In Advances in Cognitive Systems (Vol. 7). IOS Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Uzbek Journal of Law and Digital Policy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
