Modern International Issues and Prospective Solutions in the Field Of Genomics and AI Regulation: Creating a System for Assessing Safety and Ethics of AI Technologies
Abstract views: 108
/ 
PDF downloads: 61
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59022/ujldp.117Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, Genomics, Bioethics, International Law, Safety, Accountability, Human RightsAbstract
With the rapid development of genomics and artificial intelligence (AI) technologies worldwide, there is an urgent need for strengthened international regulation and cooperation to ensure these innovations are developed and deployed safely, ethically, and for the benefit of humanity. This article provides an overview of key gaps and risks in the current governance of AI and genomics across national jurisdictions, such as biased decision-making encoded in algorithms, lack of accountability mechanisms, and potential for human rights violations. It proposes the establishment of an international organization mandated to develop standardized testing protocols and evidence-based guidelines for assessing the safety, security, and ethics of AI systems. Such an organization would convene diverse representatives from governments, industry, academia, and civil society to build consensus on responsible governance approaches aligned with shared human values and international law. This article analyzes pressing issues arising from fragmented regulatory regimes and offers solutions to advance multilateral cooperation, oversight, and public trust in emerging technologies.
References
Berg, P., Baltimore, D., Boyer, H.W., Cohen, S.N., Davis, R.W., Hogness, D.S., Nathans, D., Roblin, R., Watson, J.D., Weissman, S. and Zinder, N.D., 1975. Letter: Potential biohazards of recombinant DNA molecules. Science, 185(4148), pp.303-303. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.185.4148.303
Allah Rakha, N. (2023). Revolution in Learning Through Digitization: How Technology is Changing the Landscape of Education. International Journal of Cyber Law, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.59022/ijcl.38
Danaher, J., 2019. Welcoming robots into the moral circle: a defence of ethical behaviourism. Sci Eng Ethics, 25(6), pp.2023-2049. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11948-019-00119-x
DeGrazia, D., 2022. The case for intellectual property rights in vaccine development. Journal of medical ethics, 48(1), pp.3-7.
AllahRakha, N. Analysis of the Primary Components Contributing to the Growth of the Digital Economy (November 25, 2022).
Floridi, L., 2014. The fourth revolution: How the infosphere is reshaping human reality. OUP Oxford. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-fourth-revolution-9780199606726
Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., Luetge, C., Madelin, R., Pagallo, U., Rossi, F. and Schafer, B., 2018. AI4People—an ethical framework for a good AI society: opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations. Minds and Machines, 28(4), pp.689-707. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5
Forcese, C., 2019. Globalizing privacy: the policy and legal pathways for international police access to personal data. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 27(4), pp.379-410.
AllahRakha, N. (2023). AI and the Law: Unraveling the Complexities of Regulatory Frameworks in Europe. International Bulletin of Young Scientist, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.59022/ibys.115
Fukuyama, F., 2002. Our posthuman future: Consequences of the biotechnology revolution. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Funk, C., Hefferon, M., Kennedy, B. and Johnson, C., 2020. Trust and mistrust in Americans’ views of scientific experts. Pew Research Center.
Gasser, U. and Almeida, V.A.F., 2017. A layered model for AI governance. IEEE Internet Computing, 21(6), pp.58-62. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8114684
AllahRakha, N. (2023). REGULATORY SANDBOXES: A GAME-CHANGER FOR NURTURING DIGITAL START-UPS AND FOSTERING INNOVATION. Евразийский журнал права, финансов и прикладных наук, 3(8), 120–128. извлечено от https://in-academy.uz/index.php/EJLFAS/article/view/19825
Gulyamov, S., & Bakhramova, M. (2022). Digitalization of international arbitration and dispute resolution by artificial intelligence. World Bulletin of Management and Law, 9, 79-85.
Gulyamov, S., Rustambekov, I., Narziev, O., & Xudayberganov, A. (2021). Draft Concept of the Republic of Uzbekistan in the Field of Development Artificial Intelligence for 2021-2030. Yurisprudensiya, 1, 107-21.
Hagendorff, T., 2020. The ethics of AI ethics: An evaluation of guidelines. Minds and Machines, 30(1), pp.99-120. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11023-020-09517-8
Hurlbut, J.B., 2015. Remembering the future: science, law, and the legacy of Asilomar. In Dreamscapes of modernity (pp. 126-168). University of Chicago Press.
AllahRakha, N. Analysis of the Primary Components Contributing to the Growth of the Digital Economy (November 25, 2022).
IPCC, 2022. Organization. [online] Available at: https://www.ipcc.ch/about/structure/ [Accessed 27 September 2022].
Jasanoff, S., 2018. Just transitions: A humble approach to global energy futures. Energy Research & Social Science, 35, pp.11-14. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629617304401
Allah Rakha, N. (2023). Revolution in Learning Through Digitization: How Technology is Changing the Landscape of Education. International Journal of Cyber Law, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.59022/ijcl.38
Jonas, H., 1984. The imperative of responsibility: In search of an ethics for the technological age. University of Chicago press. https://books.google.com/books/about/The_Imperative_of_Responsibility.html?id=sRP3uJkxydQC#:~:text=world's%20largest%20eBookstore.-,The%20Imperative%20of%20Responsibility%3A%20In%20Search%20of,Ethics%20for%20the%20Technological%20Age&text=Hans%20Jonas%20here%20rethinks%20the,genetic%20engineering%2C%20and%20the%20like.
Kuzma, J., 2018. Policy: Reboot the debate on genetic engineering. Nature, 561(7722), pp.165-168. https://www.nature.com/articles/531165a
AllahRakha, N. (2023). REGULATORY SANDBOXES: A GAME-CHANGER FOR NURTURING DIGITAL START-UPS AND FOSTERING INNOVATION. Евразийский журнал права, финансов и прикладных наук, 3(8), 120–128. извлечено от https://in-academy.uz/index.php/EJLFAS/article/view/19825
Lander, E.S., Baylis, F., Zhang, F., Charpentier, E., Berg, P., Bourgain, C., Friedrich, B., Joung, J.K., Li, J., Liu, D. and Naldini, L., 2019. Adopt a moratorium on heritable genome editing. Nature, 567(7747), pp.165-168. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-00726-5
Lanphier, E., Urnov, F., Haecker, S.E., Werner, M. and Smolenski, J., 2015. Don’t edit the human germ line. Nature News, 519(7544), p.410.
Lum, K. and Isaac, W., 2016. To predict and serve?. Significance, 13(5), pp.14-19.
AllahRakha, N. (2023). REGULATORY SANDBOXES: A GAME-CHANGER FOR NURTURING DIGITAL START-UPS AND FOSTERING INNOVATION. Евразийский журнал права, финансов и прикладных наук, 3(8), 120–128. извлечено от https://in-academy.uz/index.php/EJLFAS/article/view/19825
Mittelstadt, B., 2016. Automation, algorithms, and politics| auditing for transparency in content personalization systems. International Journal of Communication, 10, p.12.
Mittelstadt, B.D., 2019. Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AI. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(11), pp.501-507.
Noble, S.U., 2018. Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. NYU Press.
Nordmann, A., 2014. Responsible innovation, the art and craft of anticipation. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 1(1), pp.87-98.
O'Neil, C., 2016. Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. Broadway Books.
Overdevest, C. and Zeitlin, J., 2014. Assembling an experimentalist regime: Transnational governance interactions in the forest sector. Regulation & Governance, 8(1), pp.22-48.
AllahRakha, N. (2023). AI and the Law: Unraveling the Complexities of Regulatory Frameworks in Europe. International Bulletin of Young Scientist, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.59022/ibys.115
Parisot, J., 2017. Global perspectives on AI governance. In Proceedings of the AAAI 2017 Fall Symposium on AI for Social Good (Vol. 1, No. 2).
Pasquale, F., 2015. The black box society. Harvard University Press.
Reagle Jr, J.M., 2010. Good faith collaboration: The culture of Wikipedia. MIT press.
Allahrakha, N. (2023). Balancing Cyber-security and Privacy: Legal and Ethical Considerations in the Digital Age. Legal Issues in the Digital Age, 4(2), 78-121. Retrieved from https://lida.hse.ru/article/view/17666
S. S. Gulyamov, A. A. Rodionov, I. R. Rustambekov and A. N. Yakubov, "The Growing Significance of Cyber Law Professionals in Higher Education: Effective Learning Strategies and Innovative Approaches," 2023 3rd International Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning in Higher Education (TELE), Lipetsk, Russian Federation, 2023, pp. 117-119, doi: 10.1109/TELE58910.2023.10184186.
S. S. Gulyamov, R. A. Fayziev, A. A. Rodionov and G. A. Jakupov, "Leveraging Semantic Analysis in Machine Learning for Addressing Unstructured Challenges in Education," 2023 3rd International Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning in Higher Education (TELE), Lipetsk, Russian Federation, 2023, pp. 5-7, doi: 10.1109/TELE58910.2023.10184355.
Stahl, B.C., Timmermans, J. and Flick, C., 2016. Ethics of emerging information and communication technologies: on the implementation of responsible research and innovation. Science and public policy, 43(3), pp.369-381. https://academic.oup.com/spp/article/44/3/369/2525576
Winfield, A.F. and Jirotka, M., 2018. Ethical governance is essential to building trust in robotics and artificial intelligence systems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 376(2133), p.20180085. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/abs/10.1098/rsta.2018.0085
Allahrakha, N. (2023). Balancing Cyber-security and Privacy: Legal and Ethical Considerations in the Digital Age. Legal Issues in the Digital Age, 4(2), 78-121. Retrieved from https://lida.hse.ru/article/view/17666
Yuspin, W., Wardiono, K., Budiono, A., & Gulyamov, S. (2022). The law alteration on artificial intelligence in reducing Islamic bank’s profit and loss sharing risk. Legality : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 30(2), 267–282. https://doi.org/10.22219/ljih.v30i2.23051
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Uzbek Journal of Law and Digital Policy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
