Methods of Extracting and Analyzing Metadata for Evidentiary Purposes
Abstract views: 120
/ 
PDF downloads: 109
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59022/ujldp.233Keywords:
Metadata, Digital Forensics, Civil Proceedings, Evidence, Data Extraction, Legal Analysis, Cybersecurity, Cloud ComputingAbstract
This paper examines methods for extracting and analyzing metadata for evidentiary purposes in civil proceedings. Through a comprehensive review of current literature, legal cases, and forensic techniques, it explores the diverse approaches to metadata analysis across various digital domains, including file systems, emails, documents, web browsers, mobile devices, cloud storage, social media, and emerging technologies. The study highlights the critical role of metadata in establishing the authenticity, reliability, and chronology of digital evidence. It also addresses the challenges posed by encrypted data, large-scale analysis, and the need for robust quality assurance processes. The findings underscore the importance of adapting forensic methodologies to evolving digital landscapes while maintaining legal and ethical standards. This research contributes to the ongoing development of best practices in digital forensics and their application in civil litigation.
References
AllahRakha, N. (2023). Artificial Intelligence strategy of the Uzbekistan: Policy framework, Preferences, and challenges. International Journal of Law and Policy, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.27
AllahRakha, N. (2023). Ensuring Cyber-security in Remote Workforce: Legal Implications and International Best Practices. International Journal of Law and Policy, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.43
AllahRakha, N. (2023). Exploring the Role of Block-chain Technology in Strengthening International Legal Guarantees for Investment Activity. International Journal of Law and Policy, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.37
AllahRakha, N. (2023). The impacts of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on business and its regulatory challenges. International Journal of Law and Policy, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.23
AllahRakha, N. (2024). Cybercrime and the law: Addressing the challenges of digital forensics in criminal investigations. Mexican Law Review, 16(2), 23-54.
AllahRakha, N. (2024). Demystifying the Network and Cloud Forensics’ Legal, Ethical, and Practical Considerations. Pakistan Journal of Criminology, 16(2), 119-132. https://doi.org/10.62271/pjc.16.2.119.132
AllahRakha, N. (2024). Legal Procedure for Investigation under the Criminal Code of Uzbekistan. International Journal of Law and Policy, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.160
Arshad, H., et al. (2018). Forensic implications of WhatsApp's end-to-end encryption. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security (pp. 1–6).
Ayers, R., Brothers, S., & Jansen, W. (2014). Guidelines on mobile device forensics. NIST Special Publication 800-101, Revision 1. National Institute of Standards and Technology.
Banday, M. T. (2011). Analyzing e-mail headers for forensic investigation. Journal of Digital Forensics, Security and Law, 6(2), 49–64.
Barth, A. (2011). HTTP state management mechanism. RFC 6265, Internet Engineering Task Force.
Beebe, N. L., & Clark, J. G. (2007). Digital forensic text string searching: Improving information retrieval effectiveness by thematically clustering search results. Digital Investigation, 4, 49–54.
Burns, B., et al. (2016). Borg, Omega, and Kubernetes. ACM Queue, 14(1), 70–93.
Camera & Imaging Products Association. (2019). Exchangeable image file format for digital still cameras: Exif Version 2.32. CIPA DC-008-Translation-2019.
Carrier, B. (2004). The Sleuth Kit and Autopsy: Open source digital forensics tools for investigating computer systems and disks. Digital Investigation, 1(4), 277–283.
Carrier, B. (2005). File system forensic analysis. Addison-Wesley.
Casey, E. (2011). Digital evidence and computer crime: Forensic science, computers, and the internet (3rd ed.). Academic Press.
Chabot, Y., et al. (2014). A complete framework for temporal network forensics. Digital Investigation, 11, S95–S105.
Chung, H., et al. (2012). Digital forensic investigation of cloud storage services. Digital Investigation, 9(2), 81–95.
Crocker, D. (2009). Internet mail architecture. RFC 5598, Internet Engineering Task Force.
Diakopoulos, N. (2016). Accountability in algorithmic decision making. Communications of the ACM, 59(2), 56–62.
Garfinkel, S. L. (2007). Carving contiguous and fragmented files with fast object validation. Digital Investigation, 4, 2–12.
Garfinkel, S., Farrell, P., Roussev, V., & Dinolt, G. (2009). Bringing science to digital forensics with standardized forensic corpora. Digital Investigation, 6, S2–S11.
Gulyamov, S. S. (2023). AI authorship and ownership of intellectual property in industrial power and control systems. In Proceedings - 2023 5th International Conference on Control Systems, Mathematical Modeling, Automation and Energy Efficiency, SUMMA 2023 (pp. 217–221).
Gulyamov, S. S. (2024). Legal frameworks for the integration of artificial intelligence. IFMBE Proceedings, 92, 144–149.
Gulyamov, S. S., & Rodionov, A. A. (2024). Cyber hygiene as an effective psychological measure in the prevention of cyber addictions. Psikhologiya i Pravo = Psychology and Law, 14(2), 77–91. https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2024140206
Gulyamov, S. S., Fayziev, R. A., Rodionov, A. A., & Jakupov, G. A. (2023). Leveraging semantic analysis in machine learning for addressing unstructured challenges in education. In Proceedings - 2023 3rd International Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning in Higher Education, TELE 2023 (pp. 5–7).
Gulyamov, S. S., Fayziev, R. A., Rodionov, A. A., & Rustambekov, I. R. (2023). The role of information in developing ethical and accurate AI for energy systems. In Proceedings - 2023 5th International Conference on Control Systems, Mathematical Modeling, Automation and Energy Efficiency, SUMMA 2023 (pp. 226–230).
Gulyamov, S. S., Rodionov, A. A., Rustambekov, I. R., & Yakubov, A. N. (2023). The growing significance of cyber law professionals in higher education: Effective learning strategies and innovative approaches. In Proceedings - 2023 3rd International Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning in Higher Education, TELE 2023 (pp. 117–119).
Hargreaves, C., & Patterson, J. (2012). An automated timeline reconstruction approach for digital forensic investigations. Digital Investigation, 9, S69–S79.
Hon, W. K., Millard, C., & Walden, I. (2011). The problem of 'personal data' in cloud computing: What information is regulated?—the cloud of unknowing. International Data Privacy Law, 1(4), 211–228.
Huber, M., et al. (2011). Social snapshots: Digital forensics for online social networks. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual Computer Security Applications Conference (pp. 113–122).
Jones, K. J., & Belani, R. (2005, January 21). Web browser forensics, part 1. SecurityFocus. https://www.symantec.com/connect/articles/web-browser-forensics-part-1
Kebande, V. R., & Ray, I. (2016). A generic digital forensic investigation framework for Internet of Things (IoT). In 2016 IEEE 4th International Conference on Future Internet of Things and Cloud (FiCloud) (pp. 356–362). IEEE.
Kerr, O. S. (2018). Compelled decryption and the privilege against self-incrimination. Texas Law Review, 97, 767–799.
Kessler, G. C. (2011). Judges' awareness, understanding, and application of digital evidence. Journal of Digital Forensics, Security and Law, 6(1), 55–72.
Lee, R. (2018). SANS digital forensics and incident response poster: Creating a timeline. SANS Institute.
Lessard, J., & Kessler, G. C. (2010). Android forensics: Simplifying cell phone examinations. Small Scale Digital Device Forensics Journal, 4(1), 1–12.
Mamanazarov, S. (2024). Intellectual Property Theories as Applied to Big Data. International Journal of Law and Policy, 1(7). https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.164
Manning, C. D., Raghavan, P., & Schütze, H. (2008). Introduction to information retrieval. Cambridge University Press.
Martini, B., & Choo, K.-K. R. (2013). Cloud storage forensics: ownCloud as a case study. Digital Investigation, 10(4), 287–299.
Mathur, A., et al. (2007). New ext4 filesystem: Current status and future plans. In Proceedings of the Linux Symposium (Vol. 2, pp. 21–33).
Meiklejohn, S., et al. (2013). A fistful of bitcoins: Characterizing payments among men with no names. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Internet Measurement Conference (pp. 127–140).
Minerva, R., Biru, A., & Rotondi, D. (2015). Towards a definition of the Internet of Things (IoT). IEEE Internet Initiative, 1(1), 1–86.
Muxammadiyev Sindorbek Bobirjon o’g’li. (2023). Complexities of International Arbitrator Liability: A Comparative Analysis and the Case for Qualified Immunity. International Journal of Law and Policy, 1(5). https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.46
Oh, J., Lee, S., & Lee, S. (2011). Advanced evidence collection and analysis of web browser activity. Digital Investigation, 8, S62–S70.
Ollanazarova Mamura Muzaffarovna. (2023). Analyzing the Legal Labyrinth: Current Trends in Genetic Research and Their Legal Perspectives. International Journal of Law and Policy, 1(5). https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.84
Olsson, J., & Boldt, M. (2009). Computer forensic timeline visualization tool. Digital Investigation, 6, S78–S87.
Quick, D., & Choo, K.-K. R. (2013). Forensic collection of cloud storage data: Does the act of collection result in changes to the data or its metadata? Digital Investigation, 10(3), 266–277.
Rahm, E., & Do, H. H. (2000). Data cleaning: Problems and current approaches. IEEE Data Engineering Bulletin, 23(4), 3–13.
Richard III, G. G., & Roussev, V. (2005). Scalpel: A frugal, high-performance file carver. In Proceedings of the 2005 Digital Forensics Research Workshop (DFRWS).
Roussev, V., & Garfinkel, S. L. (2009). File fragment classification—the case for specialized approaches. In 2009 Fourth International IEEE Workshop on Systematic Approaches to Digital Forensic Engineering (pp. 3–14). IEEE.
Shamir, A., & van Someren, N. (1999). Playing hide and seek with stored keys. In International Conference on Financial Cryptography (pp. 118–124). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Ubaydullayeva, A. (2023). Artificial Intelligence and Intellectual Property: Navigating the Complexities of Cyber Law. International Journal of Law and Policy, 1(4). https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.57
Weber, R. H. (2010). Internet of Things – New security and privacy challenges. Computer Law & Security Review, 26(1), 23–30.
Xu, J. J., & Chen, H. (2005). CrimeNet explorer: A framework for criminal network knowledge discovery. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 23(2), 201–226.
Xu, Q., et al. (2018). Blockchain-based decentralized content trust for docker images. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 77(15), 18843–18865.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Uzbek Journal of Law and Digital Policy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
