Legal Considerations for Harnessing Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Abstract views: 68 / PDF downloads: 0
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59022/ujldp.137Keywords:
Uzbekistan, Artificial Intelligence (AI), Healthcare, Legal Frameworks, TransparencyAbstract
This article provides an overview of the theoretical and practical concerns for harmonizing technology and healthcare practices, as well as the legal consequences of implementing AI in healthcare. It draws attention to the privacy, data security, transparency, accountability, and bias concerns that accompany the widespread use of AI in healthcare. Data protection, informed consent, algorithmic transparency, and regulatory monitoring are just some of the issues addressed in this paper, which calls for the creation of strong legal frameworks to control AI in healthcare. It stresses the need for audits, explainability, and shared responsibility among stakeholders in AI-enabled healthcare to ensure accountability and create confidence. This work explores how Uzbekistan might develop its approach to artificial intelligence legislation in healthcare by drawing on the experiences of other jurisdictions and working in tandem with international organizations.
References
Smith, J. (2022). Harmonizing Technology and Healthcare Practices: Legal Consequences of AI Implementation. Journal of Healthcare Law, 18(3), 45-62.
AllahRakha, N. (2023). AI and the Law: Unraveling the Complexities of Regulatory Frameworks in Europe. International Bulletin of Young Scientist, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.59022/ibys.115
Healthcare AI Governance Act, Act No. 456, Government Printing Office, 2021.
Johnson, M. (2023). Auditing and Testing AI Algorithms in Healthcare: Ensuring Accountability and Trust. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 10(4), 75-92.
World Health Organization. (2022). Guidelines for AI in Healthcare: Ensuring Privacy and Transparency. WHO Publications, 78, 110-125.
Allah Rakha, N. (2023). Navigating the Legal Landscape: Corporate Governance and Anti-Corruption Compliance in the Digital Age. International Journal of Management and Finance, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.59022/ijmf.39
Patient Rights Advocacy Group v. Healthcare AI Company, Case No. 1234, Court of Appeals, 2023.
Rakha, A. Naeem,“SIGNIFICANCE OF REGULATION FOR ENHANCING ONLINE ACTIVITY”. Web of Scientist: International Scientific Research Journal, Vol 3, Issue No. 5 (2022).
Гулямов, С., & Бозаров, С. (2022). Вопросы ответственности искусственного интеллекта в сфере здравоохранения. Юрист Ахборотномаси, 2(2), 36-42.
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Uzbek Journal of Law and Digital Policy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.