Micro-Finance and Regulations
Abstract views: 39 / PDF downloads: 28
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59022/ujldp.213Keywords:
FinTech, Microfinance, Digital Financial Services, Regulation, Consumer Protection, Algorithmic LendingAbstract
Financial technology (FinTech) is disrupting microfinance services for low-income groups. However, existing regulations remain anchored to traditional in-person models, lacking updated digital provisions. Doctrinal analysis reveals major gaps in current microfinance rules regarding oversight of emerging FinTech activities. While some jurisdictions have introduced initial digital regulations, comprehensive regimes remain scarce globally. Absence of bespoke rules calibrated to the nature and risks of FinTech microfinance has adverse consequences, hampering responsible innovation. Lack of tailored regulations enables predatory lending, heightens cyber risks, allows unfair consumer treatment, and creates regulatory arbitrage. This study argues regulators urgently need to develop customized legal frameworks attuned to the FinTech microfinance sphere to realize its potential while safeguarding consumers and fairness. Targeted rules on areas like security, transparency and consumer rights are vital to balance innovation and integrity as microfinance digitizes. Further research can build optimal regulatory models adapted to diverse country and sectoral contexts.
References
AllahRakha, N. (2024). Addressing Barriers to Cross-Border Collection of E-Evidence in Criminal Investigations. International Journal of Law and Policy, 2(6), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.193
AllahRakha, N. (2024). Constitutional Safeguards for Digital Rights and Privacy. International Journal of Law and Policy, 2(4), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.172
AllahRakha, N. (2024). Cybercrime and the Legal and Ethical Challenges of Emerging Technologies. International Journal of Law and Policy, 2(5), 28–36. https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.191
AllahRakha, N. (2024). Impacts of Cybercrimes on the Digital Economy. Uzbek Journal of Law and Digital Policy, 2(3), 29–36. https://doi.org/10.59022/ujldp.207
AllahRakha, N. (2024). Legal analysis of the law of the republic of Uzbekistan" on payments and payment system". TSUL Legal Report International electronic scientific journal, 5(1), 38-55.
Arner, D. W., Barberis, J., & Buckley, R. P. (2017). FinTech and RegTech in a Nutshell, and the Future in a Sandbox. CFA Institute Research Foundation.
Association Survey. (2022). Survey of microfinance industry associations. Unpublished raw data.
Baker, C., & Velasco, J. L. (2020). Leaving no one behind: Microfinance regulation for an inclusive digital economy. Journal of International Development, 32(7), 1149-1169.
Baker, T., & Judge, K. (2022). How FinTech is defeating poverty and improving human rights. Cambridge University Press.
Bathija, S. (2018). India issues norms for P2P lending platforms. BusinessLine. https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/money-and-banking/india-issues-norms-for-p2p-lending-platforms/article24351498.ece
Blechman, B. (2022). Predatory lending in the FinTech microfinance space in Africa. MIT D-Lab.
Boyce, C., & Neale, P. (2006). Conducting in-depth interviews: A guide for designing and conducting in-depth interviews for evaluation input. Pathfinder International.
Brummer, C., & Yadav, P. (2019). FinTech and the innovation trilemma. Georgetown Law Journal, 107(235), 235-305.
CEO Interview. (2022). Interview with anonymous microfinance CEO. Unpublished raw data.
Christen, B., & Lyman, T. (2019). Microfinance consensus guidelines: Guiding principles for regulation and supervision of microfinance. CGAP.
Clifford, N. (2018). Thinking about ethics in social research: An introduction. Routledge.
Demirgüç-Kunt, A., Klapper, L., Singer, D., Ansar, S., & Hess, J. (2018). The Global Findex Database 2017: Measuring financial inclusion and the Fintech revolution. The World Bank.
di Castri, S., & Gidvani, L. (2019). Enabling digital financial inclusion through impersonal authentication. CGAP.
Dias, D., & McKee, K. (2010). Protecting branchless banking consumers: Policy objectives and regulatory options. Consultative Group to Assist the Poor (CGAP).
Europa. (2018). Crowdfunding. https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/banking-and-finance/consumer-finance-and-payments/crowdfunding_en
EY. (2019). Global FinTech adoption index 2019. Ernst & Young.
Fowler, F. J. (2013). Survey research methods. Sage publications.
Gazette of the Chambers of Oliy Majlis. (2018). On microfinance organizations. NRUZ No. 06/18/548/1195.
Gulyamov S., Raimberdiyev S. Personal Data Protection as a Tool to Fight Cyber Corruption //International Journal of Law and Policy. – 2023. – Т. 1. – №. 7.
Gulyamov Said Saidakhrorovich REGULATORY LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR THE REGULATION OF THE DIGITAL ECONOMY // НАУ. 2020. №58-1 (58). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/regulatory-legal-framework-for-the-regulation-of-the-digital-economy (дата обращения: 10.10.2023)
Interview Transcripts. (2022). [Unpublished transcripts].
Interview with Regulator A. (2022). [Unpublished interview transcript].
Lauer, K., & Lyman, T. (2022). Digital credit regulation: A guide for policymakers. CGAP.
Ledgerwood, J., Earne, J., & Nelson, C. (2013). The new microfinance handbook: A financial market system perspective. The World Bank.
Matibiri, L. (2020). Kenya enacts new data protection law. IT Web Africa. https://www.itwebafrica.com/finance-and-insurance/166-kenya/248792-kenya-enacts-new-data-protection-law
Microfinance Africa. (2019). Cyber attack costs BRAC over US$ 250,000. https://microfinanceafrica.net/news/cyber-attack-costs-brac-over-us-250000/
S. S. Gulyamov, E. Egamberdiev and A. Naeem, "Practice-Oriented Approach to Reforming the Traditional Model of Higher Education with the Application of EdTech Technologies," 2024 4th International Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning in Higher Education (TELE), Lipetsk, Russian Federation, 2024, pp. 340-343, doi: 10.1109/TELE62556.2024.10605684
Schicks, J., & Rosenberg, R. (2020). Too Much Microcredit? A Survey of the Evidence on Over-Indebtedness. Occasional Paper, (19).
Sharma, D. (2020). Digital financial inclusion: The critical role of regulation. Business Standard. https://www.business-standard.com/article/printer-friendly-version?article_id=120091301565_1
Soto, L. (2018). Fintech law aims to make Mexico the leader in Latin America. El Universal. https://www.eluniversal.com.mx/english/fintech-law-aims-make-mexico-leader-latin-america
Tiwari, A. K., Hossin, M., Hossain, M. I., & Hoque, R. (2020). Microcredit lending using social media & mobile big data. arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.00233.
Uzbekistan FinTech Survey. (2022). [Unpublished dataset].
van Wensveen, D. (2000). The functional approach in financial supervision – the Netherlands experience. De Nederlandsche Bank.
World Bank. (2018). Financial inclusion diagnostics toolkit. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/493631520561194036/Financial-inclusion-diagnostics-toolkit
Yermack, D. (2017). Corporate governance and blockchains. Review of Finance, 21(1), 7-31.
Yin, R. K. (2017). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Sage publications.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Uzbek Journal of Law and Digital Policy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.