GDPR vs. Weakly Protected Parties in Other Countries
Abstract views: 22
/ 
PDF downloads: 16
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59022/ujldp.254Keywords:
GDPR, Data Protection, Global Standards, Privacy Rights, Compliance, Harmonization, Cross-Border, Digital DivideAbstract
The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) establishes strong privacy rights for EU residents. However, many countries, including the United States, Asia, and Africa, lack similar protections. This creates challenges for multinational corporations and individuals navigating fragmented global data protection frameworks. This study examines the evolution, principles, and extraterritorial effects of GDPR, comparing it with weaker regulatory frameworks globally. Using qualitative and doctrinal research and document analysis, it identifies enforcement gaps, compliance costs, and operational difficulties in cross-border data transfers. Findings emphasize the need for consistent global standards to address the digital divide and ensure fair data practices. Recommendations highlight multilateral cooperation to develop an interoperable and ethical digital ecosystem. While GDPR offers a foundational model, achieving global harmonization requires collective international commitment. The study concludes with actionable suggestions to strengthen global privacy frameworks and protect vulnerable parties in weakly regulated regions.
References
AllahRakha, N. (2024). Constitutional Safeguards for Digital Rights and Privacy. International Journal of Law and Policy, 2(4), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.172
AllahRakha, N. (2024). Cybercrime and the Legal and Ethical Challenges of Emerging Technologies. International Journal of Law and Policy, 2(5), 28–36. https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.191
AllahRakha, N. (2024). Cybersecurity regulations for protection and safeguarding digital assets (data) in today’s worlds. Lex Scientia Law Review, 8(1), 405-432. https://doi.org/10.15294/lslr.v8i1.2081
Cory, N., Dick, E., & Castro, D. (2020, December 17). The role and value of standard contractual clauses in EU-U.S. digital trade. Information Technology and Innovation Foundation. https://itif.org/publications/2020/12/17/role-and-value-standard-contractual-clauses-eu-us-digital-trade/
Djanhoundji, T., & Constant, G. (2023). Breach notification in the General Data Protection Regulation. Voice of the Publisher, 9, 334–347. https://doi.org/10.4236/vp.2023.94026
Geller, A. (2020). How comprehensive is Chinese data protection law? A systematisation of Chinese data protection law from a European perspective. GRUR International, 69(12), 1191–1203. https://doi.org/10.1093/grurint/ikaa136
Gulyamov, S., & Raimberdiyev, S. (2023). Personal Data Protection as a Tool to Fight Cyber Corruption. International Journal of Law and Policy, 1(7). https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.119
Hallinan, D., & Zuiderveen Borgesius, F. (2020). Opinions can be incorrect (in our opinion)! On data protection law’s accuracy principle. International Data Privacy Law, 10(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1093/idpl/ipz025
Hoofnagle, C. J., van der Sloot, B., & Zuiderveen Borgesius, F. (2019). The European Union general data protection regulation: What it is and what it means. Information & Communications Technology Law, 28(1), 65–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600834.2019.1573501
Hornuf, L., Mangold, S., & Yang, Y. (2023). Data protection law in Germany, the United States, and China. In Data privacy and crowdsourcing (pp. 49-68). Advanced Studies in Diginomics and Digitalization. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32064-4_3
Karjalainen, T. (2022). All talk, no action? The effect of the GDPR accountability principle on the EU data protection paradigm. European Data Protection Law Review, 8(1), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.21552/edpl/2022/1/6
Kennedy, G., Doyle, S., & Lui, B. (2009). Data protection in the Asia-Pacific region. Computer Law & Security Review, 25(1), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2008.11.006
Ko, H., Leitner, J., Kim, E., & Jeong, J. (2017). Structure and enforcement of data privacy law in South Korea. International Data Privacy Law, 7(2), 100–114. https://doi.org/10.1093/idpl/ipx004
Lindsay, D. (2014). The ‘right to be forgotten’ in European data protection law. In N. Witzleb, D. Lindsay, M. Paterson, & S. Rodrick (Eds.), Emerging challenges in privacy law: Comparative perspectives (pp. 290–337). Cambridge University Press.
Makulilo, A. B. (Ed.). (2016). African data privacy laws. Law, Governance and Technology Series. Springer Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47317-8
Mamanazarov, S. (2024). Intellectual Property Theories as Applied to Big Data. International Journal of Law and Policy, 1(7). https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.164
Reis, O., Eneh, N. E., Ehimuan, B., Anyanwu, A., Olorunsogo, T., & Abrahams, T. O. (2024). Privacy law challenges in the digital age: A global review of legislation and enforcement. International Journal of Applied Research in Social Sciences, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.51594/ijarss.v6i1.733
Rizka, R. (2024). Legal Protection for Consumers Who Buy and Sell Used Goods on Facebook. International Journal of Law and Policy, 2(4), 44–54. https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.165
Scheibner, J., Ienca, M., Kechagia, S., Troncoso-Pastoriza, J. R., Raisaro, J. L., Hubaux, J.-P., Fellay, J., & Vayena, E. (2020). Data protection and ethics requirements for multisite research with health data: A comparative examination of legislative governance frameworks and the role of data protection technologies. Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 7(1), lsaa010. https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsaa010
Shahzady, R. (2024). The Role of Social-Media for Micro-Entrepreneurship of Young Startups. International Journal of Law and Policy, 2(6), 10–22. https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.194
Shao, D., Ishengoma, F., Nikiforova, A., & Swetu, M. (2024). Comparative analysis of data protection regulations in East African countries. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPRG-06-2024-0120
Singh, D. S., & Prerna. (2024). Regulation of cross-border data flow and its privacy in the digital era. NUJS Journal of Regulatory Studies, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.69953/nurs.v9i2.9
Singla, A. (2024). The evolving landscape of privacy law: Balancing digital innovation and individual rights. Indian Journal of Law, 2(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.36676/ijl.v2.i1.01
Tarran, B. (2018). What can we learn from the Facebook—Cambridge Analytica scandal? Significance, 15(3), 4–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-9713.2018.01139.x
Voigt, P., & von dem Bussche, A. (2017). The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR): A practical guide. Springer Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57959-7
Zelianin, A. (2022). Personal data as a market commodity in the GDPR era: A systematic review of social and economic aspects. Acta Informatica Pragensia, 11(1), 123–140. https://doi.org/10.18267/j.aip.168
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Uzbek Journal of Law and Digital Policy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
