Smart Contracts in the Civil Law System: Problems of Legal Qualification


Abstract views: 23 / PDF downloads: 19

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59022/ujldp.298

Keywords:

Smart Sontracts, Civil Law, Enforceability, Liability, Consumer Protection, Blockchain

Abstract

This article examines the legal qualification of smart contracts within civil law jurisdictions, emphasizing the challenges posed by automated, code-based agreements in systems traditionally grounded in codified statutes and doctrinal principles. By exploring current scholarly debates, legislative approaches, and judicial interpretations, this study highlights the tension between the self-executing nature of smart contracts and the requirement for consent, formality, and interpretation under civil codes. Drawing on a qualitative analysis of doctrinal writings, statutory frameworks, and case-based discussions, the paper identifies core issues of enforceability, liability, and consumer protection. Results reveal the need for a more coherent integration of legal theory and technological design, underscoring the role of hybrid solutions that blend human interpretation with automated execution. The discussion situates these findings in the broader trajectory of contract law modernization, concluding with recommendations for policymakers and practitioners regarding risk mitigation, technological design improvements, and harmonized regulatory standards.

References

AllahRakha, N. (2024). Cybersecurity regulations for protection and safeguarding digital assets (data) in today’s worlds. Lex Scientia Law Review, 8(1), 405-432. https://doi.org/10.15294/lslr.v8i1.2081

Antognini, A. (2019). Smart contracts and consumer protection in civil law countries. European Review of Private Law, 27(5), 989–1012.

Borges, G. (2019). Smart contracts and the role of law. In P. Hacker, I. Lianos, G. Dimitropoulos, & S. Eich (Eds.), Blockchains, smart contracts, decentralised autonomous organisations and the law (pp. 91–107). Edward Elgar.

Buterin, V. (2013). A next-generation smart contract and decentralized application platform. Ethereum White Paper.

Clack, C. D., Bakshi, V. A., & Braine, L. (2016). Smart contract templates: Foundations, design landscape, and research directions. arXiv preprint, arXiv:1608.00771.

Fairfield, J. A. T. (2014). Smart contracts, Bitcoin bots, and consumer protection. Washington & Lee Law Review Online, 71, 35–50.

Fernández Carballo-Calero, M. (2020). Smart contracts and the Spanish legal system. Revista de Derecho Civil, 7(2), 153–177.

Filippi, G. (2020). Smart contracts in Italy: Legal issues and enforceability under civil law. Contratto e Impresa, 36, 251–269.

Friedman, S., & Tazi, T. (2019). Smart contracts as legal contracts in France: Form requirements and consent. Revue Lamy Droit de l’Immatériel (RLDI), 160, 29–39.

Gatt, J. (2019). Smart contracts and the digital single market legislation. EUI MWP Working Paper. European University Institute.

Ikigami, H. (2020). Smart contracts under Japanese civil law: Formation, validity, and future challenges. Waseda Bulletin of Comparative Law, 41, 63–82.

Isolino, M. F. (2019). Smart contracts e diritto privato: riflessioni sulla validità e l’efficacia delle clausole contrattuali automatizzate. Diritto dell’Informazione e dell’Informatica, 2019, 497–526.

Karnitschnig, S., & Pichonnaz, P. (2020). Smart contracts and their legal challenges in Swiss private law. Revue de droit Suisse, 139, 1325–1359.

Mik, E. (2017). Smart contracts: Terminology, technical limitations and real-world complexity. Law, Innovation and Technology, 9(2), 269–300.

Noto La Diega, G., & Sappa, C. (2018). Distributed ledger technologies and smart contracts: Legal implications for civil law. European Review of Private Law, 26(6), 805–832.

Pinna, A., & Ruttenberg, W. (2016). Distributed ledger technologies in securities post-trading: Revolution or evolution? ECB Occasional Paper Series, 172. European Central Bank.

Raskin, M. (2017). The law and legality of smart contracts. Georgetown Law Technology Review, 1, 304–341.

Reyes, C. L. (2017). Conceptualizing cryptolaw. Nebraska Law Review, 96(2), 384–445.

Savelyev, A. (2016). Contract law 2.0: “Smart” contracts as the beginning of the end of classic contract law. Higher School of Economics Research Paper No. WP BRP 79/LAW/2016.

Schouppe, T. (2019). Blockchain revolution without the ‘chain’? Smart contracts and the corporate contracting process. European Business Law Review, 30(4), 571–598.

Sillaber, C., & Waltl, B. (2017). Life cycle of smart contracts in blockchain ecosystems. Datenschutz und Datensicherheit – DuD, 41(8), 497–500.

Surden, H. (2012). Computable contracts. UC Davis Law Review, 46, 629–700.

Tapscott, D., & Tapscott, A. (2016). Blockchain revolution: How the technology behind Bitcoin is changing money, business, and the world. Portfolio.

Troiano, L. (2018). Smart contracts and civil liability. Rivista di Diritto dei Media, 1, 205–220.

Werbach, K., & Cornell, N. (2017). Contracts ex machina. Duke Law Journal, 67, 313–382.

Zanfir-Fortuna, G., & Husovec, M. (2019). EU data protection and automated contractual enforcement in smart contracts. Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology, 13(2), 269–290.

Zetzsche, D. A., Buckley, R. P., & Arner, D. W. (2018). The distributed liability of distributed ledgers: Legal risks of blockchain. University of Illinois Law Review, 2018(4), 1361–1406.

Published

2025-02-28

How to Cite

Pulatov, T. (2025). Smart Contracts in the Civil Law System: Problems of Legal Qualification. Uzbek Journal of Law and Digital Policy, 3(1), 155–181. https://doi.org/10.59022/ujldp.298

Issue

Section

Articles