Smart Contracts and their Legal Recognition: Comparative Analysis of Regulatory Approaches


Abstract views: 1 / PDF downloads: 0

Authors

  • Madinabonu Yakubova Tashkent State University of Law

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59022/ujldp.471

Keywords:

Blockchain, Contract Law, Smart Contracts, Legal Recognition, Mica Regulation, Distributed Ledger Technology, Regulatory Framework, Digital Economy

Abstract

This article examines the legal status of smart contracts across different jurisdictions through a comparative legal methodology, analyzing regulatory approaches in the United States, European Union, Switzerland, Singapore, and Uzbekistan. The research identifies key challenges in integrating self-executing agreements into existing legal frameworks, including issues of contract formation, enforceability, dispute resolution, and data protection compliance. Using doctrinal analysis and comparative law methods, this study evaluates how different legal systems address the fundamental question of whether code-based agreements satisfy traditional contract formation requirements. The findings reveal a spectrum of regulatory responses ranging from explicit statutory recognition to application of existing contract law principles. The article concludes with recommendations for developing comprehensive legal frameworks that balance innovation with consumer protection and legal certainty.

References

Alawsi, H., Al-Ayash, A. A., Ibrahim, F. M., & Mohammed, M. N. (2025). Legal and technical perspectives on blockchain smart contracts: A review of regulatory challenges and innovations. In Studies in Systems, Decision and Control (Vol. 234). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-84636-6_36

Buterin, V. (2014). Ethereum: A next-generation smart contract and decentralized application platform [White paper]. Ethereum Foundation. https://ethereum.org/whitepaper

De Filippi, P., & Wright, A. (2018). Blockchain and the law: The rule of code. Harvard University Press.

Finck, M. (2017). Blockchains and data protection in the European Union. Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition Research Paper, No. 18-01. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3080322

Finck, M. (2018). Blockchain regulation and governance in Europe. Cambridge University Press.

Grand View Research. (2023). Smart contracts market size, share & trends analysis report 2023-2030. https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/smart-contracts-market

Gulyamov, S. S. (2023). Legal aspects of blockchain technology integration in public administration of Uzbekistan. Journal of Digital Technologies and Law, 1(2), 312-335.

Houben, R., & Snyers, A. (2020). Crypto-assets: Key developments, regulatory concerns and responses. European Parliament, Policy Department for Economic, Scientific and Quality of Life Policies.

Szabo, N. (1996). Smart contracts: Building blocks for digital free markets. Extropy: The Journal of Transhumanist Thought, (16), 18-22.

Werbach, K., & Cornell, N. (2017). Contracts ex machina. Duke Law Journal, 67(2), 313-382. https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/dlj/vol67/iss2/2

Zetzsche, D. A., Buckley, R. P., Arner, D. W., & Föhr, L. (2019). The ICO gold rush: It's a scam, it's a bubble, it's a super challenge for regulators. Harvard International Law Journal, 60(2), 267-315.

Zweigert, K., & Kötz, H. (1998). Introduction to comparative law (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Arizona Revised Statutes § 44-7061 (2017).

Published

2025-12-30

How to Cite

Yakubova, M. (2025). Smart Contracts and their Legal Recognition: Comparative Analysis of Regulatory Approaches. Uzbek Journal of Law and Digital Policy, 3(6), 52–72. https://doi.org/10.59022/ujldp.471

Issue

Section

Articles