Challenges and Prospects of Cooperation between the Republic of Uzbekistan and International Actors in Countering New Synthetic Narcotic Substances
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59022/ujldp.527Keywords:
Narcotic Substances, Uzbekistan, International Cooperation, Drug Trafficking, UNODC, Legal Framework, Drug Control Policy, Central AsiaAbstract
This study examines the development of cooperation between the Republic of Uzbekistan and international organizations and foreign countries in the area of controlling new synthetic narcotic substances (NSNS) and combating their illegal trafficking. The rapid proliferation of synthetic drugs presents unprecedented legal, public health, and security challenges globally, and Uzbekistan, as both a transit and increasingly a consumer country, faces specific and pressing vulnerabilities requiring a comprehensive international response. Using a qualitative research design based on doctrinal and comparative legal analysis, the study reviews binding international conventions, regional institutional frameworks, bilateral agreements, and national legislation. Findings reveal that while Uzbekistan has made meaningful progress in aligning its legal system with international drug control norms and in engaging with bodies such as the UNODC, SCO, CIS, and CSTO, significant gaps remain in early warning systems, analogue scheduling legislation, forensic infrastructure, and cross-border data sharing. The study recommends legislative modernization, enhanced multilateral coordination, forensic capacity investment, and integrated demand reduction programming as the principal priorities for strengthening Uzbekistan's response to the NSNS threat.
References
Felbab-Brown, V. (2017, November 13). Afghanistan’s opium production in 2017: Why it is up, what it means, and what to do. Brookings Institution. https://www.brookings.edu/blog/order-from-chaos/2017/11/13/afghanistans-opium-production-in-2017-why-it-is-up-what-it-means-and-what-to-do/
Grissom, B., & Harrington, D. (2019). Synthetic drugs and the limits of international drug control conventions. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 38(3), 614–638. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.22125
Jonson, L. (2018). The Shanghai Cooperation Organization and the drug problem in Afghanistan. European Journal of East Asian Studies, 17(2), 288–311. https://doi.org/10.1163/15700615-01702002
Paoli, L., Greenfield, V. A., & Reuter, P. (2009). The world heroin market: Can supply be cut? Oxford University Press.
Reuter, P., & Trautmann, F. (Eds.). (2009). A report on global illicit drugs markets 1998–2007. European Commission.
Shanghai Cooperation Organization. (2021). SCO anti-drug strategy for 2021–2025. SCO Secretariat. http://eng.sectsco.org/documents/
Tompkins, C. N., Wright, N. M. J., & Sheard, L. (2018). Smoothing over crack: User accounts of transitioning from crack cocaine to synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists. International Journal of Drug Policy, 53, 23–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.11.027
van Hoecke, M. (2011). Methodologies of legal research: Which kind of method for what kind of discipline? Hart Publishing.
Winstock, A., Barratt, M., Maier, L., & Ferris, J. (2018). Global Drug Survey 2018: Key findings report. Global Drug Survey Ltd.
Zábranský, T., Csémy, L., & Gajdošíková, H. (2011). Transition, crime and drug policy in the Czech Republic: 1990–2010. Journal of Drug Issues, 41(2), 261–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/002204261104100207
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Uzbek Journal of Law and Digital Policy

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

