Challenges and Prospects of Cooperation between the Republic of Uzbekistan and International Actors in Countering New Synthetic Narcotic Substances


Abstract views: 9 / PDF downloads: 1

Authors

  • Shakhzod Abdusattorov Tashkent State University of Law

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59022/ujldp.527

Keywords:

Narcotic Substances, Uzbekistan, International Cooperation, Drug Trafficking, UNODC, Legal Framework, Drug Control Policy, Central Asia

Abstract

This study examines the development of cooperation between the Republic of Uzbekistan and international organizations and foreign countries in the area of controlling new synthetic narcotic substances (NSNS) and combating their illegal trafficking. The rapid proliferation of synthetic drugs presents unprecedented legal, public health, and security challenges globally, and Uzbekistan, as both a transit and increasingly a consumer country, faces specific and pressing vulnerabilities requiring a comprehensive international response. Using a qualitative research design based on doctrinal and comparative legal analysis, the study reviews binding international conventions, regional institutional frameworks, bilateral agreements, and national legislation. Findings reveal that while Uzbekistan has made meaningful progress in aligning its legal system with international drug control norms and in engaging with bodies such as the UNODC, SCO, CIS, and CSTO, significant gaps remain in early warning systems, analogue scheduling legislation, forensic infrastructure, and cross-border data sharing. The study recommends legislative modernization, enhanced multilateral coordination, forensic capacity investment, and integrated demand reduction programming as the principal priorities for strengthening Uzbekistan's response to the NSNS threat.

References

Felbab-Brown, V. (2017, November 13). Afghanistan’s opium production in 2017: Why it is up, what it means, and what to do. Brookings Institution. https://www.brookings.edu/blog/order-from-chaos/2017/11/13/afghanistans-opium-production-in-2017-why-it-is-up-what-it-means-and-what-to-do/

Grissom, B., & Harrington, D. (2019). Synthetic drugs and the limits of international drug control conventions. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 38(3), 614–638. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.22125

Jonson, L. (2018). The Shanghai Cooperation Organization and the drug problem in Afghanistan. European Journal of East Asian Studies, 17(2), 288–311. https://doi.org/10.1163/15700615-01702002

Paoli, L., Greenfield, V. A., & Reuter, P. (2009). The world heroin market: Can supply be cut? Oxford University Press.

Reuter, P., & Trautmann, F. (Eds.). (2009). A report on global illicit drugs markets 1998–2007. European Commission.

Shanghai Cooperation Organization. (2021). SCO anti-drug strategy for 2021–2025. SCO Secretariat. http://eng.sectsco.org/documents/

Tompkins, C. N., Wright, N. M. J., & Sheard, L. (2018). Smoothing over crack: User accounts of transitioning from crack cocaine to synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists. International Journal of Drug Policy, 53, 23–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.11.027

van Hoecke, M. (2011). Methodologies of legal research: Which kind of method for what kind of discipline? Hart Publishing.

Winstock, A., Barratt, M., Maier, L., & Ferris, J. (2018). Global Drug Survey 2018: Key findings report. Global Drug Survey Ltd.

Zábranský, T., Csémy, L., & Gajdošíková, H. (2011). Transition, crime and drug policy in the Czech Republic: 1990–2010. Journal of Drug Issues, 41(2), 261–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/002204261104100207

Published

2026-04-30

How to Cite

Abdusattorov , S. (2026). Challenges and Prospects of Cooperation between the Republic of Uzbekistan and International Actors in Countering New Synthetic Narcotic Substances. Uzbek Journal of Law and Digital Policy, 4(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.59022/ujldp.527

Issue

Section

Articles