Civil Law Regulation of Human Biomechanical Changes in Modern Technological Progress


Abstract views: 55 / PDF downloads: 35

Authors

  • Vosiyev Jamshid Mustafoevich Tashkent State University of Law

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59022/ujldp.61

Keywords:

Human Biomechanical Enhancements, Civil Law Regulation, FDA, Medical Devices Regulation, Technological Progress, Ethical Challenges, Legal Frameworks, Jurisdiction, Enforcement, Regulatory Approaches, Potential Impacts, Future Research Directions

Abstract

This article examines the growing field of human biomechanical enhancements, focusing on the technologies, potential impacts, and civil law regulations that govern their development and use. With rapid advancements in biomechanical enhancement technologies, individuals and society are faced with a range of benefits and risks that demand careful consideration and regulation. The article delves into various types of biomechanical enhancements, discussing their potential implications for human performance, health, and ethical concerns. The study also investigates existing national and international civil law frameworks, such as the United States' FDA regulations and the EU's Medical Devices Regulation (MDR), comparing regulatory approaches across different jurisdictions. It assesses the effectiveness of these frameworks in addressing the challenges posed by human biomechanical enhancements and highlights the ethical, social, and legal challenges involved in regulating these technologies. The article analyzes the effectiveness of current civil law regulations and discusses the challenges faced in implementing and enforcing these frameworks. Potential improvements and recommendations for enhancing the effectiveness of civil law regulation in relation to human biomechanical enhancements are proposed, considering the rapid pace of technological advancement. The article concludes by summarizing the key findings, emphasizing the importance of effective civil law regulation in addressing the implications of human biomechanical enhancements. It also suggests future research directions that could further explore this topic and contribute to the ongoing debate on civil law regulation of human biomechanical enhancements in the age of technological progress.

References

Bostrom, N., & Sandberg, A. (2009). Cognitive enhancement: Methods, ethics, regulatory challenges. Science and Engineering Ethics, 15(3), 311-341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-009-9142-5

Burri, A. (2019). Regulating human enhancement: Challenges and prospects. Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 6(1), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsz009

Allah Rakha, N. (2023). Artificial Intelligence strategy of the Uzbekistan: Policy framework, Preferences, and challenges. International Journal of Law and Policy, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.27 retrieved from https://irshadjournals.com/index.php/ijlp/article/view/27

FDA (2021). Medical Devices. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices

European Commission (2021). Medical devices: Regulatory framework. European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/health/md_sector/legal_framework_en

Allah Rakha, Naeem, “Analysis of the Primary Components Contributing to the Growth of the Digital Economy” SSRN Electronic Journal, 2022, http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4286088.

Glannon, W. (2014). Ethical issues with brain-computer interfaces. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 8, 136. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2014.00136

Henschke, A. (2017). Ethics and the future of spying: Technology, national security, and intelligence collection. Journal of Military Ethics, 16(3-4), 300-302. https://doi.org/10.1080/15027570.2017.1409261

Allah Rakha, N. (2023). Cyber Law: Safeguarding Digital Spaces in Uzbekistan. International Journal of Cyber Law, 1(5). https://doi.org/10.59022/ijcl.53 retrieved from https://irshadjournals.com/index.php/ijcl/article/view/53

Karpowicz, P. (2019). The human enhancement debate and the question of human nature. Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 6(2), 445-468. https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsz016

Lin, P., Abney, K., & Bekey, G. A. (2012). Robot ethics: The ethical and social implications of robotics. MIT Press.

McLuhan, R., & Howell, R. (2014). Cognitive enhancement and the identity objection. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 31(4), 381-394. https://doi.org/10.1111/japp.12072

Allah Rakha, Naeem, “LEGAL REGULATION OF DIGITAL ECONOMY IN EU AND IMPLEMENTATION OF EU EXPERIENCE IN UZBEKISTAN”. Conferencea, June 2022, pp. 71-75, https://conferencea.org/index.php/conferences/article/view/758.

World Health Organization (2021). Medical devices. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/medical_devices/en/

Gulyamov, S., Rustambekov, I., Narziev, O., & Xudayberganov, A. (2021). Draft Concept of the Republic of Uzbekistan in the Field of Development Artificial Intelligence for 2021-2030. Yurisprudensiya, 1, 107-21.

Published

2023-02-28

How to Cite

Vosiyev Jamshid Mustafoevich. (2023). Civil Law Regulation of Human Biomechanical Changes in Modern Technological Progress. Uzbek Journal of Law and Digital Policy, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.59022/ujldp.61

Issue

Section

Articles