Transparency Challenges in Sports Arbitration: Analysis and Solutions
Abstract views: 141 / PDF downloads: 227
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59022/ujldp.72Keywords:
Sports Arbitration, Transparency, Confidentiality, Decision-making, Court of Arbitration for Sport, Legal Frameworks, Centralized Database, Dispute ResolutionAbstract
This article investigates the issue of transparency in sports arbitration, a critical factor in maintaining the credibility and fairness of the arbitration process. The study employs a qualitative research design, examining case studies, legal frameworks, and expert opinions to provide a comprehensive understanding of the transparency issue. The findings reveal that the lack of transparency stems from confidentiality clauses, limited access to arbitration decisions, and the absence of clear reasoning in decision-making. The article proposes a combination of solutions, including revising confidentiality clauses, establishing a centralized database of decisions, and developing guidelines for clear and consistent reasoning. The proposed recommendations contribute to a more transparent and trustworthy sports arbitration system, fostering trust and fairness among athletes, sports organizations, and the public. The study offers valuable insights and recommendations for stakeholders in sports arbitration and provides a foundation for further research and policy development in the area of sports arbitration transparency. Future research directions include exploring the practical challenges of implementing the proposed solutions, examining the long-term effects of increased transparency on the sports arbitration system, and investigating the impact of emerging technologies on the transparency and efficiency of sports arbitration.
References
Bernstein, D. J., & Lange, T. (2017). Post-quantum cryptography. Nature, 549(7671), 188-194. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature23461
Allah Rakha, N. (2023). The Role of the International Olympic Committee (IOC) in Sports: The Integration of IT in Sports and the Future of Online Gaming. Cyber Law Review, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.59022/clr.28 retrieved from https://irshadjournals.com/index.php/ijcl/article/view/28
Blackshaw, I. S. (2012). Sports law and the legal basis of sports arbitration. The International Sports Law Journal, 12(3-4), 90-95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40318-013-0006-0
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
CAS. (2021). Code of Sports-Related Arbitration. Court of Arbitration for Sport. https://www.tas-cas.org/en/arbitration/code-procedural-rules.html
Duval, A. (2016). The Court of Arbitration for Sport and EU law: Chronicle of an encounter. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 23(2), 224-255. https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X1602300203
Gek, D., & Szymanski, S. (2018). Why FIFA cannot credibly commit to reform: A critical review of FIFA's governance reforms. International Journal of Sport Finance, 13(1), 4-18. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2811243
Levit, J. (2019). Enhancing the legitimacy of international sports arbitration through transparency. Pepperdine Law Review, 46(2), 259-289. https://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/plr/vol46/iss2/4
Mavroidis, P. C. (2016). The regulation of international trade: The WTO agreements on trade in goods. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262029841.001.0001
Mitten, M. J., & Opie, H. (2017). Legal aspects of the Court of Arbitration for Sport's decision in the Essendon case. Australian and New Zealand Sports Law Journal, 11(1), 47-75. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3015961 Allah Rakha, Naeem, “HOW THE EU CREATES LAWS”. Eurasian Journal of Law, Finance and Applied Sciences, Vol 2, Issue No. 6 (2022), pp. 4-9, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6615907
Rigozzi, A., Bernasconi, M., & Rosenfeld, T. (2015). The 2015 edition of the CAS code: A critical review of the new provisions. The International Sports Law Journal, 15(3-4), 154-166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40318-015-0071-6
UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration. (1985). United Nations Commission on International Trade Law. https://uncitral.un.org/en/texts/arbitration/modellaw/commercial_arbitration
Allah Rakha, N. (2023). Exploring the Role of Block-chain Technology in Strengthening International Legal Guarantees for Investment Activity. International Journal of Law and Policy, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.37 Retrieved from https://irshadjournals.com/index.php/ijlp/article/view/37
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Uzbek Journal of Law and Digital Policy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.