Globalization of Civil Law Regulation of Blockchain Technologies and Its Implementation in Uzbekistan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59022/ujldp.473Keywords:
Globalization, Civil Law Regulation, Blockchain Technologies, Payment Services Act, Japan, Self-Regulation, Digital Assets, UzbekistanAbstract
The phenomenon of globalization in civil law regulation of blockchain technologies is examined using the example of Japan's Payment Services Act. In the context of active economic digitalization, the problem of effective adaptation of international standards to national legal systems acquires particular relevance. The principles of adapting international FATF standards to the national characteristics of Japan's legal system are analyzed using a comprehensive methodology including glocalization analysis, comparative legal method, and institutional analysis. Key elements of the Japanese model have been identified: technological neutrality with functional regulation, multi-level regulation with clear division of powers between government bodies and self-regulatory organizations, the institution of self-regulation through the Japan Virtual Currency Exchange Association (JVCEA), and a system of “regulatory sandboxes” for testing innovations. The study demonstrated high efficiency of the Japanese approach, confirmed by the growth of cryptocurrency transaction volume to $116 billion USD in 2023. Opportunities for applying Japan's glocalization experience to improve Uzbekistan's civil legislation in the field of digital technologies have been determined, including creating specialized regulatory bodies, implementing experimental legal regimes, and developing self-regulatory institutions. The research results can be used for forming a national digital development strategy and attracting international investments to the fintech sector.
References
Alaassar, A., Mention, A.-L., & Aas, T. H. (2021). Exploring a new incubation model for FinTechs: Regulatory sandboxes. Technovation, 103, 102237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102237
Buchanan, J., & Deakin, S. (2024). Has Japan’s corporate governance reform reached a turning point? Some cautionary notes. Asia Pacific Business Review, 30(3), 433–450. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602381.2024.2320535
Damak, O. I., & Güngör, H. (2025). The effects of rule of law, regulatory quality, and Research Development on Japan ’s environmental sustainability. Sustainable Development, 33(2), 2278–2291. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3233
Gulyamov, S. (2024). Application of Computational Law and Artificial Intelligence Methods for Sharia Compliance Analysis of E-Waste Management Systems Based on Blockchain. Suhuf, 36(1), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.23917/suhuf.v36i1.4447
Jayasuriya Daluwathumullagamage, D., & Sims, A. (2020). Blockchain-Enabled Corporate Governance and Regulation. International Journal of Financial Studies, 8(2), 36. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs8020036
Mehrling, P. (2012). Three Principles for Market-Based Credit Regulation. American Economic Review, 102(3), 107–112. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.102.3.107
Ovsiannikov, K. (2017). Corporate Governance Reforms in Japan: Instilling the New Regime. Cogent Business & Management, 4(1), 1300993. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2017.1300993
Plekhanov, D., Franke, H., & Netland, T. H. (2023). Digital transformation: A review and research agenda. European Management Journal, 41(6), 821–844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2022.09.007
Rahman, J., Rahman, H., Islam, N., Tanchangya, T., Ridwan, M., & Ali, M. (2025). Regulatory landscape of blockchain assets: Analyzing the drivers of NFT and cryptocurrency regulation. BenchCouncil Transactions on Benchmarks, Standards and Evaluations, 5(1), 100214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbench.2025.100214
Zafar, A. (2025). Reconciling blockchain technology and data protection laws: regulatory challenges, technical solutions, and practical pathways. Journal of Cybersecurity, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/cybsec/tyaf002
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Uzbek Journal of Law and Digital Policy

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

