Social Networks and Cybercrime: Exploring State Responsibility in the Digital Age


Abstract views: 134 / PDF downloads: 94

Authors

  • Sadokat Safoyeva Tashkent State University of Law

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59022/ujldp.65

Keywords:

Social Networks, Cybercrime, State Responsibility, International Law, Cyber-security, Legal Frameworks, Enforcement Mechanisms, CFAA, GDPR, National Legislation, Cybercrime Prevention, State Accountability

Abstract

This article explores the complex relationship between social networks and cybercrime, focusing on the importance of state responsibility in addressing these emerging threats in the digital age. The study examines various types of cybercrimes on social networks, providing examples and case studies to illustrate the involvement of state and non-state actors. It investigates the international law principles applicable to cybercrime on social networks and state responsibility, as well as regional and national legislation such as the United States' CFAA and the EU's GDPR. The effectiveness of these legal frameworks in holding states accountable is analyzed, along with the mechanisms for enforcing state responsibility, including international cooperation efforts and the role of national law enforcement agencies. The article discusses the challenges faced in enforcing state responsibility and proposes potential improvements and recommendations to enhance the effectiveness of existing frameworks and mechanisms. By highlighting the implications of state responsibility in addressing cybercrime on social networks for policymakers, stakeholders, and the development of cybercrime prevention strategies, this study contributes to the ongoing debate on state responsibility and cyber-security within the context of social networks, and suggests future research directions to further explore this topic.

References

Bernstein, D. J., & Lange, T. (2017). Post-quantum cryptography. Nature, 549(7671), 188-194. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature23461

Council of Europe. (2001). Convention on Cybercrime. Budapest. Retrieved from https://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/treaty/185

Allah Rakha, N. (2023). The legal Aspects of the Digital Economy in the Age of AI. International Journal of Cyber Law, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.59022/clr.30 retrieved from https://irshadjournals.com/index.php/ijcl/article/view/30

Saidakhrorovich, G. S. (2020). REGULATORY LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR THE REGULATION OF THE DIGITAL ECONOMY. Национальная ассоциация ученых, (58-1 (58)), 33-35.

ITU. (2022). About ITU. Retrieved from https://www.itu.int/en/about/Pages/default.aspx

Rustambekov, I. (2020). Some Aspects of Implementation of Private International Law Principles in Civil Code of Uzbekistan. Available at SSRN 3642669.

Allah Rakha, N. (2023). The Ethics of Data Mining: Lessons from the Cambridge Analytica Scandal. Cyber Law Review, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.59022/clr.24 retrieved from https://irshadjournals.com/index.php/ijcl/article/view/24

Tsagourias, N., & Buchan, R. (2015). Research handbook on international law and cyberspace. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781782547396

U.S. Department of Justice. (2022). Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. Retrieved from https://www.justice.gov/criminal-ccips/file/1029066/download

Allah Rakha, N. (2023). The impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on business and its regulatory challenges. International Journal of Law and Policy, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.23 retrieved from https://irshadjournals.com/index.php/ijlp/article/view/23

United Nations. (2021). Report of the United Nations Open-ended Working Group on Developments in the Field of Information and Telecommunications in the Context of International Security. Retrieved from https://undocs.org/A/75/266

European Commission. (2016). General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj

Allah Rakha, N. (2023). Artificial Intelligence and HR Management. International Journal of Management and Finance, 1(1). Retrieved from https://irshadjournals.com/index.php/ijmf/article/view/25

OSCE. (2013). Decision No. 1106: Initial Set of OSCE Confidence-Building Measures to Reduce the Risks of Conflict Stemming from the Use of Information and Communication Technologies. Retrieved from https://www.osce.org/files/f/documents/5/3/108533.pdf

Published

2023-02-28

How to Cite

Safoyeva , S. (2023). Social Networks and Cybercrime: Exploring State Responsibility in the Digital Age. Uzbek Journal of Law and Digital Policy, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.59022/ujldp.65

Issue

Section

Articles