Examining the Role and Qualification Requirements of Experts in Digital Arbitration
![](https://ojsdergi.com/ojsicons/gor.png)
![](https://ojsdergi.com/ojsicons/pdf.png)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59022/ujldp.82Keywords:
Digital Arbitration, Expert Qualifications, International Guidelines, Certification Programs, Transparency, Impartiality, Conflict of Interest, Dispute ResolutionAbstract
This study investigates the role and qualification requirements of experts in digital arbitration, identifying several limitations in the current qualification requirements, such as inconsistent criteria across jurisdictions and institutions, lack of emphasis on relevant technical expertise, and potential conflicts of interest arising from the expert selection process. To address these limitations, we propose a set of potential solutions, including the development of international guidelines for expert qualifications, the implementation of certification programs for digital arbitration experts, and the promotion of transparency and impartiality in expert selection. Our findings have important implications for policymakers, arbitration institutions, and practitioners in the field of digital arbitration, as they highlight the need for standardized qualification requirements and a more rigorous approach to expert selection to enhance the credibility, effectiveness, and fairness of digital arbitration processes. We suggest future research directions, such as investigating the practical challenges and opportunities associated with implementing the proposed solutions and exploring the potential impact of emerging technologies on the role and qualifications of experts in digital arbitration.
References
Bishop, R. D., A. M. (2010). Experts in international arbitration. JurisNet, LLC. https://www.jurispub.com/Bookstore/Arbitration-ADR/Experts-in-International-Arbitration.html
Allah Rakha, N. (2023). Cyber Law: Safeguarding Digital Spaces in Uzbekistan. International Journal of Cyber Law, 1(5). https://doi.org/10.59022/ijcl.53 retrieved from https://irshadjournals.com/index.php/ijcl/article/view/53
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/designing-and-conducting-mixed-methods-research/book244263
Allah Rakha, N. (2023). Ensuring Cyber-security in Remote Workforce: Legal Implications and International Best Practices. International Journal of Law and Policy, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.43 retrieved from https://irshadjournals.com/index.php/ijlp/article/view/43
Friedman, L., & Mason, S. (2011). The digital expert in international arbitration. Fordham International Law Journal, 34(3), 771-793. https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ilj/vol34/iss3/6
Hantrais, L. (2009). International comparative research: theory, methods and practice. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-07792-2
Allah Rakha, N. (2023). Artificial Intelligence and Sustainability. International Journal of Cyber Law, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.59022/ijcl.42 retrieved from https://irshadjournals.com/index.php/ijcl/article/view/42
Mistelis, L., & Brekoulakis, S. (Eds.). (2014). Arbitrability: international and comparative perspectives. Kluwer Law International. https://www.wklawbusiness.com/store/products/arbitrability-international-comparative-perspectives-prod-9041128853/hardcover-item-1-9041128853
Rogers, C. A., & Alford, R. P. (2013). The role of experts in international arbitration. Journal of Dispute Resolution, 2013(1), 1-34. https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/jdr/vol2013/iss1/7
Allah Rakha, N. (2023). Navigating the Legal Landscape: Corporate Governance and Anti-Corruption Compliance in the Digital Age. International Journal of Management and Finance, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.59022/ijmf.39 Retrieved from https://irshadjournals.com/index.php/ijmf/article/view/39
Waibel, M., & Wu, M. (2017). Digital currency in a world of sovereign currencies. SSRN. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2946163
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Uzbek Journal of Law and Digital Policy
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.