Sovereignty beyond Borders: Unraveling the Enigma of Airspace and Outer Space Interplay
Abstract views: 154
/ 
PDF downloads: 127
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.201Keywords:
Air Law, Airspace, Delimitation, Global Commons, ICAO, Outer Space, Sovereignty, Space LawAbstract
This paper examines the complex issue of delimitation and sovereignty in airspace and outer space, tracing the evolution of these concepts from ancient jurisprudence to contemporary international law. The study delves into the origins of air sovereignty, emphasizing the legal maxim "Cuius est solum eius usque ad coelum et ad inferos" and the subsequent development of aviation law, including the pivotal Convention on International Civil Aviation. It further explores the nascent field of space law, highlighting the Outer Space Treaty and its designation of outer space as res communis humanitatis. The paper analyzes various attempts to delineate a boundary between airspace and outer space, contrasting the spatialist, functionalist, and "wait-and-see" approaches. It evaluates the pros and cons of establishing a clear demarcation, considering technological advancements and geopolitical tensions. Potential solutions are proposed, including drawing analogies from the Law of the Sea and enhancing the role of international organizations such as ICAO. The paper underscores the urgency of resolving these issues to ensure normative certainty and address the growing congestion in the skies.
References
Agreement on the Rescue of Astronauts, the Return of Astronauts and the Return of Objects Launched into Outer Space, done in London/Moscow/Washington on 22 April 1967;
Antarctic Treaty System, done in Washington D.C. on December 1, 1959;
Bodin J. (1579). Les six livres de la république. https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k536293
Bolt M. (2013). The Changing Nature of Sovereignty. In E-International Relation. https://www.e-ir.info/2013/10/17/the-changing-nature-of-sovereignty/
Bourbonnière M. (2004). Law of armed conflict and the neutralisation of satellites or ‘jus in bello satellitis’. In Journal of Conflict & Security Law, 9(1), 43-69. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcsl/9.1.43 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jcsl/9.1.43
Charter of the United Nations, United Nations done in San Francisco on 26 June 1945;
Cheney T. & Napier L. (2015). Policy analysis: air versus space, where do suborbital flights fit into international regulation?. In Journal of Science Policy & Governance, 7(1). https://www.sciencepolicyjournal.org/uploads/5/4/3/4/5434385/pm3finalformatted.pdf
Cheng B. (1980). The legal regime of airspace and outer space: the boundary problem functionalism versus spatialism: the major premises. In Annals of Air and Space Law, 5, 323-362 https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198257301.003.0014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198257301.003.0014
Cheng B. (1983), The legal status of outer space and relevant issues: delimitation of outer space and definition of peaceful use. In Journal of Space Law, 11(1), 93. https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/jrlsl11&div=16&id=&page=
Cheng B. Air law, in Encyclopedia Britannica, 2019. www.britannica.com/topic/air-law
Vöneky S. Analogy in international law. Oxford Public International Law. https://opil.ouplaw.com/display/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e1375
Coke E. (2003). The selected writings and speeches of Sir Edward Coke. Sheppard T. (eds.), Liberty Fund, Indianapolis, Indiana, 2, 607. https://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/shepherd-selected-writings-of-sir-edward-coke-vol-ii
Convention on International Civil Aviation, done in Chicago on 7 December 1944;
Convention on International Liability for Damage Caused by Space Objects, United Nations, done in London/Moscow/Washington D.C. on 29 March 1972;
Convention on Registration of Objects Launched into Outer Space, United Nations, done in New York on 14 January 1975; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020782900040675
Cooper J.C. (1952). Roman law and the maxim ‘cujus est solum’. In international air law. McGill Law Journal, 1(1). https://canlii.ca/t/7mz3p
Dempsey P.S. & Manoli M. (2017). Suborbital flights and the delimitation of air space vis-à-vis outer space: functionalism, spatialism and state sovereignty. In Annals of Air and Space Law, XLII. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3241421
Dodge M.S. (2009). Sovereignty and the delimitation of airspace: a philosophical and historical survey supported by the resources of the Andrew G. Haley archive. In Journal of Space Law, 35(1), 26. https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/jrlsl35&div=7&id=&page=
Donohue L.K. (2021). Who owns the skies? Ad coelum, property rights and state sovereignty. In FEENEY M. (eds.), Eyes to the sky: privacy and commerce in the age of the drone, Cato Institute. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3823362
Gangale T. (2018), How high is the sky?. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden, The Netherlands. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004366022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004366022
Gorove S. (1979). The Geostationary Orbit: Issues of Law and Policy. In The American Journal of International Law, 73(3), 444-461. https://doi.org/10.2307/2201144 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2201144
Grauberg I. (2019). National Sovereignty – an Outdated Concept of the Globalizing World?, Tallinn University School of Governance, Law and Society. http://www.tlu.ee/en/School-of-Governance-Law-and-Society
Intertanko (2019). Jamming and spoofing of global navigation satellite systems (GNSS). https://www.maritimeglobalsecurity.org/media/1043/2019-jamming-spoofing-of-gnss.pdf
Klein H.D. (1959). Cujus est solum ejus est… quosque tandem. In Journal of Air Law and Commerce, 26(3:2), 237-254. https://scholar/smu.edu/jalc/vol26/iss3/2
Lee D. (2012). Sources of Sovereignty: Roman Imperium and Dominium in Civilian Theories of Sovereignty, Editrice Il Mulino S.p.A.. https://doi.org/10.7381/70632
Levinson D.J. (2023). Law versus sovereignty. In Law for leviathan: constitutional law, international law, and the state, online edn., Oxford Academic. https://doi.org/10.1093/9780190061593.003.0004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/9780190061616.001.0001
Mendes De Leon P. (2002), The dynamics of sovereignty and jurisdiction in international aviation law. In Kreijen G et al.(eds.) State, sovereignty, and international governance, Oxford University Press, 483-495. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199245383.003.0021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199245383.003.0021
Mountin S.M. (2014). The legality and implications of intentional interference with commercial communication satellite signals. In International Law Studies, 90(101). https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/ils/vol90/iss1/12/
Onuf N.G. (1971). The principle of nonintervention, the united nations, and the international system. In International Organization, 25(2), 209-227. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2706084 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300017616
Quadri R. (1960), Prolegomeni al diritto internazionale cosmico. In Quaderni di diritto internazionale, Istituto per gli Studi di Politica Internazionale, Milano, 1. https://books.google.nl/books/about/Prolegomeni_al_diritto_internazionale_co.html?id=NTKBGwAACAAJ&redir_esc=y
Radford J.H. (2005). Telecommunications technology and sovereignty: effects on states as information transfer increased from the speed of oxcart to the speed of light. Old Dominion University. https://doi.org/10.25777/3y6q-ak07
Reinhardt D.N. (2007). The vertical limit of state sovereignty. In Journal of Air Law and Commerce, 72(1:4). https://scholar.smu.edu/jalc/vol72/iss1/4/
Rogers R. (2019). The sea of the universe: how maritime law's limitation on liability gets it right, and why space law should follow by example. In Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 26(2:10). https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ijgls/vol26/iss2/10 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2979/indjglolegstu.26.2.0741
Rooney J.J. (2020). Weaponizing space: it was just a matter of time. In American Intelligence Journal, 37(1), 87-97. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27087686
Stahn C. (2006). ‘Jus ad bellum’, ‘jus in bello’ . . . ‘jus post bellum’? – Rethinking the Conception of the Law of Armed Force. In European Journal of International Law, 17(5), 921-943. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chl037 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chl037
Ulpian. Digesto, 1.31.1.
Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies, United Nations, done in London/Moscow/Washington D.C. on 27 January 1967;
UNA/AC.105/889/Add.10.
Benkoe M. & Plescher E. (2013). Space law: reconsidering the definition/delimitation question and the passage of spacecraft through foreign airspace. Eleven International Publishing, The Hague. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/291521873_Space_Law_Reconsidering_the_DefinitionDelimitation_Question_and_the_Passage_of_Spacecraft_through_Foreign_Airspace
United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, United Nations, done in Montego Bay on 10 December 1982.
Vogler J.(1995). The global commons: a regime analysis. Chichester, Wiley&Sons. https://doi.org/10.2307/2625565 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2625565
Westbrook T. (2023). A taxonomy of radiofrequency jamming and spoofing strategies and criminal motives. In Journal of Strategic Security, 16(2), 68-80. https://doi.org/10.5038/1944-0472.16.2.2081 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5038/1944-0472.16.2.2081
Wijkman M. (1982). Managing the global commons. In International Organization, 36(3), 511-536. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300032628 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300032628
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Raoul Cardellini Leipertz
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
