UNESCO's AI Ethics Principles: Challenges and Opportunities


Abstract views: 211 / PDF downloads: 174

Authors

  • Naeem AllahRakha Tashkent State University of Law

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.225

Keywords:

UNESCO, AI, Ethics, AI Principles, AI challenges

Abstract

This paper examines UNESCO's Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence, which outlines key principles for ensuring responsible AI development. The aim is to explore the challenges and opportunities in implementing these principles in the current AI landscape. Through a literature review, comparative analysis of existing frameworks, and case studies. This research identifies key challenges such as cultural variability, regulatory gaps, and the rapid pace of AI innovation. Conversely, it highlights opportunities like establishing global ethical standards, fostering public trust, and promoting responsible AI innovation. The study proposes strategies for overcoming challenges, including clear ethical metrics, international oversight, and ethics education in AI curricula. The findings emphasize the requirement for global cooperation and robust governance mechanisms to ensure ethical AI development. The research concludes that while implementing UNESCO's AI ethics principles is complex, it is crucial for safeguarding human rights and promoting sustainable AI growth worldwide.

References

Abdikhakimov, I. (2024). Preparing for a Quantum Future: Strategies for Strengthening International Data Privacy in the Face of Evolving Technologies. International Journal of Law and Policy, 2(5), 42–46. https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.189 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.189

Adams, C., Pente, P., Lemermeyer, G., & Rockwell, G. (2023). Ethical principles for artificial intelligence in K-12 education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100131 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100131

Akbar, A., & Dilnoza, S. (2024). Rights and Freedoms of Wives and Their Guarantees in the Republic of Uzbekistan. International Journal of Law and Policy, 2(8), 42–47. https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.217 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.217

AllahRakha, N. (2023). The impacts of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on business and its regulatory challenges. International Journal of Law and Policy, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.23 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.23

AllahRakha, N. (2024). Addressing Barriers to Cross-Border Collection of E-Evidence in Criminal Investigations. International Journal of Law and Policy, 2(6), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.193 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.193

AllahRakha, N. (2024). Cybercrime and the Legal and Ethical Challenges of Emerging Technologies. International Journal of Law and Policy, 2(5), 28–36. https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.191 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.191

Bankins, S., & Formosa, P. (2023). The Ethical Implications of Artificial Intelligence (AI) For Meaningful Work. Journal of Business Ethics, 185(4), 725–740. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-023-05339-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-023-05339-7

Birkstedt, T., Minkkinen, M., Tandon, A., & Mäntymäki, M. (2023). AI governance: themes, knowledge gaps and future agendas. Internet Research, 33(7), 133–167. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-01-2022-0042 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-01-2022-0042

Budiono, A., Utami, R., & Ngestiningrum, A. (2024). Juridical Review of Legal Relationships of the Parties in Digital Marketplace Transactions (Study on Tiktok Marketplace). International Journal of Law and Policy, 2(5), 16–27. https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.190 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.190

Cardellini Leipertz, R. (2024). Sovereignty beyond Borders: Unraveling the Enigma of Airspace and Outer Space Interplay. International Journal of Law and Policy, 2(7), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.201 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.201

Chugh, N. (2021). Risk assessment tools on trial: Lessons learned for “Ethical AI” in the criminal justice system. 2021 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISTAS52410.2021.9629143 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ISTAS52410.2021.9629143

Díaz-Rodríguez, N., Del Ser, J., Coeckelbergh, M., López de Prado, M., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2023). Connecting the dots in trustworthy Artificial Intelligence: From AI principles, ethics, and key requirements to responsible AI systems and regulation. Information Fusion, 99, 101896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2023.101896 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2023.101896

Fedele, A., Punzi, C., & Tramacere, S. (2024). The ALTAI checklist as a tool to assess ethical and legal implications for a trustworthy AI development in education. Computer Law & Security Review, 53, 105986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2024.105986 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2024.105986

Floridi, L. (2023). A Unified Framework of Ethical Principles for AI. In The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence (pp. 57–66). Oxford University PressOxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198883098.003.0004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198883098.003.0004

Floridi, L., & Cowls, J. (2021). A Unified Framework of Five Principles for AI in Society (pp. 5–17). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81907-1_2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81907-1_2

Gbaya, M. S. (2024). The Legal Framework for Regional Organisations in Africa and the Proactive Role in Addressing Threats to International Peace and Security . International Journal of Law and Policy, 2(8), 12–31. https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.209 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.209

Gilbert, S. (2024). The EU passes the AI Act and its implications for digital medicine are unclear. Npj Digital Medicine, 7(1), 135. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-024-01116-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-024-01116-6

HOSAİN, Md. T., ANİK, M. H., RAFİ, S., TABASSUM, R., INSİA, K., & SIDDIKY, Md. M. (2023). Path To Gain Functional Transparency In Artificial Intelligence With Meaningful Explainability. Journal of Metaverse, 3(2), 166–180. https://doi.org/10.57019/jmv.1306685 DOI: https://doi.org/10.57019/jmv.1306685

Ismaylovna, B. J. (2024). Problems of Admissibility and Reliability of Metadata as Evidence. International Journal of Law and Policy, 2(8), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.208 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.208

Kan, E. (2024). Empowering Patients through Transparent Access to Personal Health Data. International Journal of Law and Policy, 2(5), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.188 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.188

Khogali, H. O., & Mekid, S. (2023). The blended future of automation and AI: Examining some long-term societal and ethical impact features. Technology in Society, 73, 102232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102232 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102232

Kumar, S. (2024). Online Defamation in the Digital Age: Issues and Challenges with Particular Reference to Deepfakes and Malicious Bots. International Journal of Law and Policy, 2(8), 32–41. https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.200 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.200

Lo Piano, S. (2020). Ethical principles in machine learning and artificial intelligence: cases from the field and possible ways forward. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 7(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-0501-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-0501-9

Machado, H., Silva, S., & Neiva, L. (2023). Publics’ views on ethical challenges of artificial intelligence: a scoping review. AI and Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-023-00387-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-023-00387-1

Munn, L. (2023). The uselessness of AI ethics. AI and Ethics, 3(3), 869–877. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-022-00209-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-022-00209-w

Naik, N., Hameed, B. M. Z., Shetty, D. K., Swain, D., Shah, M., Paul, R., Aggarwal, K., Ibrahim, S., Patil, V., Smriti, K., Shetty, S., Rai, B. P., Chlosta, P., & Somani, B. K. (2022). Legal and Ethical Consideration in Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: Who Takes Responsibility? Frontiers in Surgery, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.862322 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.862322

Nguyen, A., Ngo, H. N., Hong, Y., Dang, B., & Nguyen, B.-P. T. (2023). Ethical principles for artificial intelligence in education. Education and Information Technologies, 28(4), 4221–4241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11316-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11316-w

Oniani, D., Hilsman, J., Peng, Y., Poropatich, R. K., Pamplin, J. C., Legault, G. L., & Wang, Y. (2023). Adopting and expanding ethical principles for generative artificial intelligence from military to healthcare. Npj Digital Medicine, 6(1), 225. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-023-00965-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-023-00965-x

Ozmen Garibay, O., Winslow, B., Andolina, S., Antona, M., Bodenschatz, A., Coursaris, C., Falco, G., Fiore, S. M., Garibay, I., Grieman, K., Havens, J. C., Jirotka, M., Kacorri, H., Karwowski, W., Kider, J., Konstan, J., Koon, S., Lopez-Gonzalez, M., Maifeld-Carucci, I., … Xu, W. (2023). Six Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence Grand Challenges. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 39(3), 391–437. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2153320 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2153320

Patel, M. (2024). Legal and Technical Challenges of Developing Robust Traceability Systems for Genetically Modified Organisms. International Journal of Law and Policy, 2(6), 23–33. https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.195 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.195

Perkins, M., Furze, L., Roe, J., & MacVaugh, J. (2024). The Artificial Intelligence Assessment Scale (AIAS): A Framework for Ethical Integration of Generative AI in Educational Assessment. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 21(06). https://doi.org/10.53761/q3azde36 DOI: https://doi.org/10.53761/q3azde36

Ramos, G., Squicciarini, M., & Lamm, E. (2024). Making AI Ethical by Design: The UNESCO Perspective. Computer, 57(2), 33–43. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2023.3325949 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2023.3325949

Schaich Borg, J. (2021). Four investment areas for ethical AI: Transdisciplinary opportunities to close the publication-to-practice gap. Big Data & Society, 8(2), 205395172110401. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211040197 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211040197

Shahzady, R. (2024). The Role of Social-Media for Micro-Entrepreneurship of Young Startups. International Journal of Law and Policy, 2(6), 10–22. https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.194 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.194

Stahl, B. C., & Eke, D. (2024). The ethics of ChatGPT – Exploring the ethical issues of an emerging technology. International Journal of Information Management, 74, 102700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102700 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102700

Tallberg, J., Erman, E., Furendal, M., Geith, J., Klamberg, M., & Lundgren, M. (2023). The Global Governance of Artificial Intelligence: Next Steps for Empirical and Normative Research. International Studies Review, 25(3). https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viad040 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viad040

Trotta, A., Ziosi, M., & Lomonaco, V. (2023a). The future of ethics in AI: challenges and opportunities. AI & SOCIETY, 38(2), 439–441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-023-01644-x

Trotta, A., Ziosi, M., & Lomonaco, V. (2023b). The future of ethics in AI: challenges and opportunities. AI & SOCIETY, 38(2), 439–441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-023-01644-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-023-01644-x

Turdialiev, M. (2024). Navigating the Maze: AI and Automated Decision-Making Systems in Private International Law. International Journal of Law and Policy, 2(7), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.198 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.198

van Norren, D. E. (2023). The ethics of artificial intelligence, UNESCO and the African Ubuntu perspective. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 21(1), 112–128. https://doi.org/10.1108/JICES-04-2022-0037 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JICES-04-2022-0037

Walter, Y. (2024). Managing the race to the moon: Global policy and governance in Artificial Intelligence regulation—A contemporary overview and an analysis of socioeconomic consequences. Discover Artificial Intelligence, 4(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-024-00109-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-024-00109-4

Yakubova, M. (2024). The Legal Challenges of Regulating AI in Cybersecurity: A Comparative Analysis of Uzbekistan and Global Approaches. International Journal of Law and Policy, 2(7), 7–10. https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.202 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.202

Yekaterina, K. (2024). Challenges and Opportunities for AI in Healthcare. International Journal of Law and Policy, 2(7), 11–15. https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.203 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.203

Downloads

Published

2024-09-30

How to Cite

AllahRakha, N. (2024). UNESCO’s AI Ethics Principles: Challenges and Opportunities. International Journal of Law and Policy, 2(9), 24–36. https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.225

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 9 (2024)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Naeem AllahRakha

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.