Sustainable Trade and the WTO: The Compliance Dilemma


Abstract views: 61 / PDF downloads: 33

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.226

Keywords:

World Trade Organisation, International Trade, International Relations, Trade Law, Sustainable Trade, Climate Change

Abstract

International trade, often prioritizing competitiveness, clashes with the need for climate action, particularly impacting developing countries reliant on trade. This paper examines the "compliance dilemma" - the struggle to implement climate-mitigating policies without harming these economies. While the WTO aims to incorporate sustainable development, the paper argues that current provisions within the WTO and GATT Agreements are insufficient and often lead to negative economic consequences for developing nations. For example, the EU's Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), designed to reduce emissions, could harm exports from developing countries. The paper proposes establishing a WTO International Law Compliance Commission (WILCC) to align WTO rules with international law, address exploitable loopholes in trade agreements, and harmonize trade and environmental policies in collaboration with the UNFCCC. This framework seeks to ensure trade supports both climate action and sustainable economic growth for all stakeholders.

References

Ad Hoc Working Group on Long-term Cooperative Action under the Convention (AWG-LCA). (2012). Doha Outcome Document. UNFCCC.

Brack. (Jul. 1995). Balancing Trade and the Environment. Ethics, the Environment and the Changing International Order, 71(3), 497-514. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2624837

Fatima, S. (2005). Using International Law in Domestic Courts. Hart Publishing, Oxford.

Olawuyi, D. S. (2014). Harmonizing International Trade and Climate Change Institutions: Legal and Theoretical Basis for Systemic Integration. 7 LAW & DEV. REV. 107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ldr-2014-0023

Taylor, L. a. (July 2004). Unmasking the Pollution Haven Effect. NBER Working Paper No. 10629.

UNFCCC. (2015, November). The Paris Agreement, COP21. Paris Climate Conference.

United Nations. (1969, May 23). Treaty Series, Art. 31(3)(c). Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, 1155, 331. United Nations.

United Nations. (1992). Agenda 21. UNCED.

United Nations Secretary General. (2004). Report of the UN Secretary General’s High-Level Panel on Threats, Challenges and Climate Change.

World Trade Organization. (1982, February 22). L/5198. GATT Agreement.

World Trade Organization. (1994). Dispute Settlement Understanding, Art. 3.

World Trade Organization. (1995). Preambulatory Clauses. Marrakesh Agreement.

World Trade Organization. (January 1948). General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, Article 20 (b)-(g).

Xiaobei, F. J. (2022, March). The Global Impact of a Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: A Quantitative Assessment. Task Force on Climate, Development and the International Monetary Fund.

Young, M. (2022, May). Working Paper 09: Improving Border Adjustment Mechanisms. Institute for International Trade. The University of Adelaide.

Published

2024-11-29

How to Cite

Biji, E. (2024). Sustainable Trade and the WTO: The Compliance Dilemma. International Journal of Law and Policy, 2(11), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.226

Issue

Section

Articles