The Right to be Forgotten in the Digital Age: A Comparative Analysis of Legal Practice in the EU, USA, Russia, And Uzbekistan


Abstract views: 14 / PDF downloads: 6

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.301

Keywords:

Right to be Forgotten, Data Protection, GDPR, Privacy Law, Comparative Law, Uzbekistan, Digital Rights

Abstract

This article provides a comprehensive examination of the right to be forgotten, comparing its legal foundations, interpretations, and enforcement across four jurisdictions: the European Union, the United States, the Russian Federation, and the Republic of Uzbekistan. It explores how cultural values, constitutional principles, and political environments shape the practical scope of data-erasure provisions and delisting requests in each setting. Through a comparative legal methodology, the research draws on statutes, court rulings, academic publications, and advocacy group reports to illustrate the delicate balance between privacy protection and freedom of expression. The analysis gives particular attention to the General Data Protection Regulation in the European Union, state-level privacy laws in the United States, legislative amendments in Russia, and evolving data-protection norms in Uzbekistan. Key findings highlight the influence of differing legal cultures, institutional structures, and enforcement mechanisms on the efficacy of the right to be forgotten, while also addressing the potential misuse of erasure requests to stifle public-interest information. The article concludes by considering prospects for cross-border cooperation and the continued evolution of data-protection frameworks amid rapidly changing technologies.

References

Alessi, S. (2017). Eternal sunshine: The right to be forgotten in the European Union after the 2016 General Data Protection Regulation. Emory International Law Review, 32(1), 145. Retrieved from https://scholarlycommons.law.emory.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1186&context=eilr

AllahRakha, N. (2023). Regulatory barriers impacting circular economy development. International Journal of Management and Finance, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.59022/ijmf.29

AllahRakha, N. (2024). Rethinking digital borders to address jurisdiction and governance in the global digital economy. International Journal of Law and Policy, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.124 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.124

AllahRakha, N. (2025). National policy frameworks for AI in leading states. International Journal of Law and Policy, 3(1), 38–51. https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.270 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.270

de Bruin, R. (2022). A comparative analysis of the EU and U.S. data privacy regimes and the potential for convergence. Hastings Science & Technology Law Journal, 13(2), 127–168. https://repository.uclawsf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1115&context=hastings_science_technology_law_journal

Dror-Shpoliansky, D., & Shany, Y. (2021). It’s the end of the (offline) world as we know it: From human rights to digital human rights – A proposed typology. European Journal of International Law, 32(4), 1249–1282. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chab087 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chab087

Erdos, D. (2021). The ‘right to be forgotten’ beyond the EU: An analysis of wider G20 regulatory action and potential next steps. Journal of Media Law, 13(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/17577632.2021.1884947 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17577632.2021.1884947

Kohl, U. (2023). The right to be forgotten in data protection law and two Western cultures of privacy. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 72(3), 737–769. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589323000258 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589323000258

Myers, C. (2016). Digital immortality vs. “the right to be forgotten”: A comparison of U.S. and E.U. laws concerning social media privacy. Romanian Journal of Communication and Public Relations, 16(3), 47–60. https://doi.org/10.21018/rjcpr.2014.3.175 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21018/rjcpr.2014.3.175

Peters, A. (2015). Corruption and human rights (Working Paper No. 20). Basel Institute on Governance. https://www.mpil.de/files/pdf4/Peters_Corruption_and_Human_Rights20152.pdf

Voss, W. G., & Houser, K. A. (2019). Personal data and the GDPR: Providing a competitive advantage for U.S. companies. American Business Law Journal, 56(2), 287–344. https://doi.org/10.1111/ablj.12139 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ablj.12139

Published

2025-03-30

How to Cite

Pulatov, T., & Jalolova , K. (2025). The Right to be Forgotten in the Digital Age: A Comparative Analysis of Legal Practice in the EU, USA, Russia, And Uzbekistan. International Journal of Law and Policy, 3(3), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.301

Issue

Section

Articles