The Legal Doctrine of Separation of Power in the Constitution
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.467Keywords:
Legislative, Executive, Judicial, Accountability, Legal DoctrineAbstract
The separation of powers is a foundational doctrine of constitutional governance, designed to prevent the concentration of authority and protect liberty. It typically divides state functions into three distinct branches: the legislative (which makes laws), the executive (which implements and enforces laws), and the judiciary (which interprets laws and administers justice). By allocating specific powers to separate institutions, the system creates a framework of checks and balances. Each branch is granted the ability to restrain potential excesses by the others, such as through executive vetoes, legislative oversight, or judicial review. This deliberate diffusion of power aims to foster accountability, limit arbitrary governance, and safeguard individual rights. While models vary globally from the strict separation in presidential systems like the USA to the more fused structures in parliamentary systems the core objective remains: to ensure that no single entity holds unchecked power, thereby sustaining a stable and democratic polity.
References
Allah Rakha, N. (2023). Artificial Intelligence strategy of the Uzbekistan: Policy framework, Preferences, and challenges. International Journal of Law and Policy, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.27 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.27
AllahRakha, N. (2025). Cross-Border E-Crimes: Jurisdiction and Due Process Challenges. ADLIYA: Jurnal Hukum Dan Kemanusiaan, 18(2), 153–170. https://doi.org/10.15575/adliya.v18i2.38633 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15575/adliya.v18i2.38633
Dogar, A. (2025). The Challenges of Independence of Judiciary. International Journal of Law and Policy, 3(12), 49–67. https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.466 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.466
Lake, D. A. (2013). Authority, Coercion, and Power in International Relations. In Back to Basics (pp. 55–77). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199970087.003.0004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199970087.003.0004
Magill, M. E. (2000). The Real Separation in Separation of Powers Law. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.224797 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.224797
Pirie, F. (2024). Why the rule of law? A historical perspective. Comparative Legal History, 12(2), 136–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/2049677X.2024.2418274 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2049677X.2024.2418274
Salzberger, E., & Voigt, S. (2009). Separation of powers: new perspectives and empirical findings—introduction. Constitutional Political Economy, 20(3–4), 197–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10602-009-9076-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10602-009-9076-6
SHEEHAN, C. A. (2004). Madison v. Hamilton: The Battle Over Republicanism and the Role of Public Opinion. American Political Science Review, 98(3), 405–424. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055404001248 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055404001248
Waldron, J. (2020). Separation of powers in thought and practice? Revista de Direito Administrativo, 279(3), 17–53. https://doi.org/10.12660/rda.v279.2020.82914 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12660/rda.v279.2020.82914
Wood, B. D. (2011). Congress and the Executive Branch: Delegation and Presidential Dominance. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199559947.003.0034 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199559947.003.0034
Zhai, X. (2022). The People’s ‘Greatest Misfortune’ and ‘All the Chance the People Have.’ In Bentham on Democracy, Courts, and Codification (pp. 157–192). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009031745.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009031745.009
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ali Bhatti

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
