The Principle of Natural Justice in Administrative Law


DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.368Keywords:
Natural Justice, Administrative Law, Fair Hearing, Rule Against Bias, Due Process, Judicial Review, Procedural FairnessAbstract
The principle of natural justice is a cornerstone of administrative law, ensuring fairness, transparency, and accountability in decision-making processes. Rooted in the idea that no individual should be condemned unheard, natural justice encompasses two fundamental rules: audi alteram partem (the right to be heard) and nemo judex in causa sua (no one should be a judge in their own cause). These principles act as safeguards against arbitrary and biased administrative actions, thereby protecting individual rights and promoting public trust in governance. Courts across jurisdictions have reinforced the application of natural justice by requiring that administrative authorities provide adequate notice, fair hearings, and reasoned decisions. Although flexible in application, its essence lies in balancing efficiency with fairness in administrative functions. By upholding natural justice, administrative law bridges the gap between authority and individual liberty, ensuring that justice is not only done but also seen to be done.
References
Antonio, P.-S. (2017). Natural Law. In A History of Law in Europe (pp. 342–358). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316848227.027 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316848227.027
Cananea, G. della. (2023). The Development of Administrative Law: Fact and Theory. In The Common Core of European Administrative Laws (pp. 1–20). Brill | Nijhoff. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004549579_002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004549579_002
Forgács, A. (2023). Right to a reasoned decision. In Referendum Authorization Procedures in Europe (pp. 140–161). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035311217.00014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035311217.00014
Gooch, Graham., & Williams, Michael. (2015). A dictionary of law enforcement. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acref/9780191758256.001.0001
Imam, A. A., & Mohammed, I. B. (2023). Legal Issues in Remand Proceedings under the Administration of Criminal Justice in Nigeria. ABUAD Law Journal, 11(1), 78–96. https://doi.org/10.53982/alj.2023.1101.04-j DOI: https://doi.org/10.53982/alj.2023.1101.04-j
Morrison-Saunders, A., & Early, G. (2008). What is necessary to ensure natural justice in environmental impact assessment decision-making? Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 26(1), 29–42. https://doi.org/10.3152/146155108X303210 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3152/146155108X303210
Moussa, M. (2025). Expanding the Nemo Judex Rule: Reflections on Non-Pecuniary Bias. Judicial Review, 30(2), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/10854681.2025.2503651 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10854681.2025.2503651
Ojumu, C., Emeje, A., & Nwajah, P. O. (2022). Jurisprudential Examination of the Constituent Kernels of Fair Hearing. ABUAD Law Journal, 10(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.53982/alj.2022.1001.01-j DOI: https://doi.org/10.53982/alj.2022.1001.01-j
Vakil, R. (2018). Constitutionalizing administrative law in the Indian Supreme Court: Natural justice and fundamental rights. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 16(2), 475–502. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moy027 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moy027
Wade, S. W., Forsyth, C., & Ghosh, J. (2022a). 12. Natural Justice and Legal Justice. In Wade & Forsyth’s Administrative Law (pp. 357–366). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198806851.003.0012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198806851.003.0012
Wade, S. W., Forsyth, C., & Ghosh, J. (2022b). 13. The Rule Against Bias. In Wade & Forsyth’s Administrative Law (pp. 367–387). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198806851.003.0013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198806851.003.0013
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Shaheen Iqbal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.