International Legal Practice of Material Transfer Agreements: A Comparative Legal Analysis
Abstract views: 18
/ 
PDF downloads: 15
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.494Keywords:
Material Transfer Agreements, Comparative Legal Analysis, Biotechnology Law, Intellectual Property, Genetic ResourcesAbstract
This comparative legal analysis examines international practices governing Material Transfer Agreements in biotechnology across four major jurisdictions: the United States, the European Union, Japan, and China. Through a systematic doctrinal methodology and functional comparison, the study analyzes the evolution of regulations, contractual frameworks, and intellectual property regimes. Results reveal significant jurisdictional variations in balancing innovation, biosecurity, and equity. American market pragmatism, as exemplified by the UBMTA standardization, contrasts with European precautionary harmonization, Japanese relationship-based cooperation, and Chinese sovereignty-focused frameworks. Findings demonstrate persistent divergences despite the universal recognition of the importance of biosafety, intellectual property, and benefit sharing. These insights inform the development of effective MTA frameworks in developing countries, which balance competing objectives.
References
Berg, P., Baltimore, D., Brenner, S., Roblin, R. O., & Singer, M. F. (1975). Asilomar conference on recombinant DNA molecules. Science, 188(4192), 991–994. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1056638 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1056638
Bubela, T., Guebert, J., & Mishra, A. (2015). Use and misuse of material transfer agreements: Lessons in proportionality from research, repositories, and litigation. PLoS Biology, 13(2), Article e1002060. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002060 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002060
Contreras, J. L. (2015). Bermuda's legacy: Policy, patents, and the design of the genome commons. Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology, 12(1), 61–125.
Cornish, W. R., & Llewelyn, D. (2007). Intellectual property: Patents, copyright, trade marks and allied rights (6th ed.). Sweet & Maxwell.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Eisenberg, R. S. (1989). Proprietary rights and the norms of science in biotechnology research. Yale Law Journal, 97(2), 177–231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/796481
Greiber, T., Peña Moreno, S., Åhrén, M., Carrasco, J. N., Kamau, E. C., Medaglia, J. C., Oliva, M. J., & Perron-Welch, F. (2012). An explanatory guide to the Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit-sharing. IUCN.
Kaye, J., Boddington, P., de Vries, J., Hawkins, N., & Melham, K. (2012). Ethical implications of the use of whole genome methods in medical research. European Journal of Human Genetics, 20(10), 1077–1081. https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2012.55 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2012.55
Lei, Z., Juneja, R., & Wright, B. D. (2009). Patents versus patenting: Implications of intellectual property protection for biological research. Nature Biotechnology, 27(1), 36–40. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0109-36 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0109-36
Mowery, D. C., Nelson, R. R., Sampat, B. N., & Ziedonis, A. A. (2001). The growth of patenting and licensing by U.S. universities: An assessment of the effects of the Bayh-Dole Act of 1980. Research Policy, 30(1), 99–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00100-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00100-6
Pressman, L., Burgess, R., Cook-Deegan, R., McCormack, S. J., Nami-Wolk, I., Soucy, M., & Walters, L. (2006). The licensing of DNA patents by US academic institutions: An empirical survey. Nature Biotechnology, 24(1), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1165 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0106-31
Rodriguez, V., Janssens, F., Debackere, K., & De Moor, B. (2007). Do material transfer agreements affect the choice of research agendas? The case of biotechnology in Belgium. Scientometrics, 71(2), 239–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1666-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1666-3
Streitz, W. D., & Bennett, A. B. (2003). Material transfer agreements: A University perspective. Plant Physiology, 133(1), 10–13. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.103.027706 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.103.026658
Walsh, J. P., Cohen, W. M., & Cho, C. (2007). Where excludability matters: Material versus intellectual property in academic biomedical research. Research Policy, 36(8), 1184–1203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.04.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.04.006
Zweigert, K., & Kötz, H. (1998). An introduction to comparative law (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sardor Mamanazarov
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
