Presumption of Innocence in Criminal Justice System


Abstract views: 8 / PDF downloads: 4

Authors

  • Asad Rao University of Sargodha, Sargodha

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.498

Keywords:

Presumption of Innocence, Criminal Justice System, Pretrial Detention, Prosecutorial Accountability, Comparative Criminal Procedure, Fair Trial Rights, Wrongful Convictions

Abstract

The presumption of innocence represents the most fundamental guarantee within any fair criminal justice system. Despite its universal recognition in constitutional texts and international human rights instruments, this principle faces persistent and systematic erosion across multiple jurisdictions worldwide. This study examines the theoretical foundations, institutional failures, and procedural weaknesses that collectively undermine effective application of this vital right. Employing qualitative doctrinal and document analysis methodology, the research comparatively evaluates common law and civil law systems to identify where protection succeeds and where it critically fails. Findings reveal that pretrial detention, prosecutorial misconduct, media prejudice, and algorithmic bias represent the most serious contemporary threats. A comprehensive four-pillar legal framework is proposed, addressing procedural reform, prosecutorial accountability, media regulation, and judicial education simultaneously. The study contributes a cross-jurisdictional reform model that connects legal theory directly to institutional practice, offering policymakers, judges, and legal reformers an evidence-based pathway toward genuinely protecting innocence in modern criminal proceedings.

References

Allan, T. R. S. (2015). Law, liberty, and justice: The legal foundations of British constitutionalism. Oxford University Press.

Ashworth, A. (2006). Four threats to the presumption of innocence. International Journal of Evidence and Proof, 10(4), 241–279. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1350/ijep.10.4.241

Baldwin, J., & McConville, M. (1977). Negotiated justice: Pressures to plead guilty. Martin Robertson.

Belloni, F., & Hodgson, J. (2000). Criminal injustice: An evaluation of the criminal justice process in Britain. Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230599765

Bennett, M. W. (2011). Unraveling the Gordian knot of implicit bias in jury selection. Harvard Law and Policy Review, 4(1), 149–171.

Bibas, S. (2004). Plea bargaining outside the shadow of trial. Harvard Law Review, 117(8), 2463–2547. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/4093404

Bottoms, A., & Tankebe, J. (2012). Beyond procedural justice: A dialogic approach to legitimacy in criminal justice. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 102(1), 119–170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198701996.003.0001

Burke, A. S. (2022). Prosecutorial overreach and evidentiary fairness. Criminal Law Quarterly, 68(2), 210–234.

Dripps, D. A. (2003). Akhil Amar on criminal procedure and constitutional law. Duke Law Journal, 74(1), 1–56.

Duff, R. A., Farmer, L., Marshall, S., & Tadros, V. (2007). The trial on trial: Towards a normative theory of the criminal trial. Hart Publishing.

Feld, B. C. (2024). Juvenile courts and the erosion of innocence protections. Law & Society Review, 58(1), 45–78.

Ferzan, K. K. (2010). Preventive justice and the presumption of innocence. Criminal Law and Philosophy, 8(2), 505–525. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-013-9275-0

Findley, K. A., & Scott, M. S. (2006). The multiple dimensions of tunnel vision in criminal cases. Wisconsin Law Review, 2006(2), 291–397.

Frase, R. S. (2013). Just sentencing: Principles and procedures for a workable system. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199757862.001.0001

Garland, D. (2001). The culture of control: Crime and social order in contemporary society. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226190174.001.0001

Garrett, B. L. (2020). Wrongful convictions and the presumption of innocence. Virginia Law Review, 106(3), 559–612.

Greene, E., & Dodge, M. (1995). The influence of prior record evidence on juror decision making. Law and Human Behavior, 19(1), 67–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01499073

Halliday, S., & Schmidt, P. (2009). Conducting law and society research: Reflections on methods and practices. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609770

Hodgson, J. (2021). Comparing adversarial and inquisitorial protections for the accused. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 41(3), 789–814. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199981427.003.0001

Jackson, J. D. (2009). Re-conceptualizing the right of silence as an effective fair trial standard. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 58(4), 835–861. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589309001407

Jackson, J. D., & Summers, S. J. (2012). The internationalisation of criminal evidence: Beyond the common law and civil law traditions. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139093606

Kaplan, J. (1968). Of robbers, rape, and resolutions. Stanford Law Review, 20(6), 1092–1120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1227493

Kemp, G. (2010). Criminal procedure: A contextual text. Juta and Company.

King, M., & Piper, C. (2007). How the law thinks about children. Arena Publications.

Langbein, J. H. (1978). Torture and plea bargaining. University of Chicago Law Review, 46(1), 3–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1599287

Langer, M. (2014). Criminal jurisdiction and its discontents. UCLA Law Review, 61(6), 1514–1575.

Laudan, L. (2006). Truth, error, and criminal law: An essay in legal epistemology. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511617515

Lippke, R. L. (2021). Media, public opinion, and the right to be presumed innocent. Criminal Justice Ethics, 40(2), 101–119.

Luna, E., & Wade, M. (2010). The prosecutor in transnational perspective. Oxford University Press.

Natapoff, A. (2022). Misdemeanor justice and institutional efficiency. Harvard Law Review, 135(6), 1708–1754.

Nobles, R., & Schiff, D. (2010). The criminal cases review commission: Establishing a workable relationship with the court of appeal. Oxford University Press.

Pizzi, W. T. (1999). Trials without truth: Why our system of criminal trials has become an expensive failure and what we need to do to rebuild it. New York University Press.

Redmayne, M. (2007). Rethinking the privilege against self-incrimination. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 27(2), 209–232. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gql001

Risinger, D. M. (2007). Innocents convicted: An empirically justified factual wrongful conviction rate. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 97(3), 761–806. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.931454

Sanders, A., Young, R., & Burton, M. (2010). Criminal justice (4th ed.). Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780199541317.001.0001

Spencer, J. R. (2002). Evidence of bad character. Hart Publishing.

Stevenson, M. (2021). Pretrial detention and sentencing outcomes. Journal of Law and Economics, 64(2), 367–393.

Published

2026-04-30

How to Cite

Rao, A. (2026). Presumption of Innocence in Criminal Justice System. International Journal of Law and Policy, 4(4), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.498

Issue

Section

Articles