Modern Trend and Role of Jurisprudence in this Era


Abstract views: 5 / PDF downloads: 0

Authors

  • Sadia Sattar Lahore Leads University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.507

Keywords:

Interdisciplinary, Technology, Globalization, Human Rights, Interpretation, Social Change, Governance

Abstract

Jurisprudence, the theoretical study of law, is undergoing a significant transformation in the modern era, reflecting its dynamic role in navigating complex societal challenges. The contemporary trend is characterized by a pronounced interdisciplinary shift, integrating insights from economics, cognitive science, political philosophy, and data science. This move beyond traditional analytical frameworks allows for a more nuanced understanding of law as a social instrument. Consequently, modern jurisprudence actively engages with pressing issues like technological governance (AI, digital privacy, algorithmic bias), global justice (human rights, climate change law), and identity-based claims (gender, race, and indigenous rights). Its role has evolved from a purely explanatory to a critical and reform oriented one. By analyzing the foundations, efficacy, and ethical implications of law in a rapidly changing world, jurisprudence now serves as an essential intellectual toolkit for crafting just, responsive, and legitimate legal systems for the 21st century.

References

Ginty, R. M. (2008). Indigenous peace-making versus the liberal peace. Cooperation and Conflict, 43(2), 139–163. http://www.jstor.org/stable/45084517 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836708089080

Goodman, J. (2007). Non-state actors: Multinational corporations and international non-governmental organisations. In An introduction to international relations (pp. 272–282). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139168557.025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139168557.025

Gulyaeva, E. E., & Felix, H. G. D. (2025). Impact of digital technologies on legal theory and practice. Qubahan Techno Journal, 4(4), 12–22. https://doi.org/10.48161/qtj.v4n4a76 DOI: https://doi.org/10.48161/qtj.v4n4a76

Indriati, E. D., Ana, S., & Nugroho, N. (2022). Philosophy of law and the development of law as a normative legal science. International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences, 3(1), 425–432. https://doi.org/10.51601/ijersc.v3i1.293 DOI: https://doi.org/10.51601/ijersc.v3i1.293

Khan, A., & Shah Jiliani, M. A. H. (2023). Expanding the boundaries of jurisprudence in the era of technological advancements. IIUM Law Journal, 31(2). https://doi.org/10.31436/iiumlj.v31i2.856 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31436/iiumlj.v31i2.856

Kumm, M. (2016). Constituent power, cosmopolitan constitutionalism, and post-positivist law. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 14(3), 697–711. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mow050 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mow050

Li, M. (2024). Cultivating citizens' awareness of the rule of law from the perspective of building a law-based society. Science of Law Journal, 3(4). https://doi.org/10.23977/law.2024.030409 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23977/law.2024.030409

Marshall, D. W. (2017, April). Tuning: A guide for creating discipline-specific frameworks to foster meaningful change. National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment.

McKerchar, M. (2012). Defining and describing what we do: Doctrinal legal research. Deakin Law Review, 17(1), 83–119. https://doi.org/10.21153/dlr2012vol17no1art70 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21153/dlr2012vol17no1art70

Neil Duxbury, N. (2012). Uses of critique. In Patterns of American jurisprudence. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198264910.003.0007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198264910.003.0007

(Original work published 1997)

Northrop, F. S. C. (1952). Contemporary jurisprudence and international law. The Yale Law Journal, 61(5), 623–654. https://doi.org/10.2307/793514 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/793514

Rethinking legal legitimacy: A critical study of law and morality in pluralistic societies. (2026). Lentera Hukum, 12(3), 537–577. https://doi.org/10.19184/ejlh.v12i3.53707 DOI: https://doi.org/10.19184/ejlh.v12i3.53707

Saeed, A., Mujaddid, G., & Rasool, W. (2023). Political sociology and its implications on contemporary world politics. Journal of Asian Development Studies, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.62345/

Siddique, O. (2013). Reform nirvanas and reality checks: Justice sector reform in Pakistan in the twenty-first century and the monopoly of the “experts.” In Pakistan’s experience with formal law: An alien justice (pp. 340–428). Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139814508.007

Tamanaha, B. Z. (2015). The third pillar of jurisprudence: Social legal theory. 56 William & Mary Law Review, 2235–2300. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmlr/vol56/iss6/6

Yadav, S. (2024). Jurisprudence in the digital age: Adapting legal theories to emerging technologies. International Journal of Law, Justice and Jurisprudence, 4(2), 299–305. https://doi.org/10.22271/2790-0673.2024.v4.i2d.151 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22271/2790-0673.2024.v4.i2d.151

Published

2026-02-28

How to Cite

Sattar, S. (2026). Modern Trend and Role of Jurisprudence in this Era . International Journal of Law and Policy, 4(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.507

Issue

Section

Articles