Digital Permanent Establishment, OECD Pillar One, and Source Taxation Erosion in the European Union
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.568Keywords:
Digital Permanent Establishment, OECD Pillar One, Source Taxation, Digital Economy Taxation, International Tax Law, Multinational Enterprises, Profit Allocation RulesAbstract
The rapid growth of the digital economy challenges traditional rules of international taxation. Existing tax systems rely on physical presence to determine business taxation rights. However, digital companies earn significant profits without maintaining physical operations in market states. This situation creates gaps between economic activity and taxing jurisdiction under current law. The concept of Digital Permanent Establishment attempts to address this imbalance in taxation authority. It recognizes sustained digital interaction with users as a basis for taxation rights. The OECD introduced Pillar One to reallocate taxing rights toward market jurisdictions fairly. Pillar One focuses on large multinational enterprises generating profits through digitalized business models. It aims to ensure that profits are taxed where users and consumers create value. Source taxation principles therefore regain importance within modern international tax governance frameworks. These reforms seek fairness, prevent profit shifting, and reduce harmful tax competition globally. The study examines legal challenges, implementation barriers, and policy implications of these evolving taxation rules.
References
Abraham, S. (2025). Treaty integration challenges in the digital economy: A critical analysis of multilateral instruments. International Tax Law Review, 42(3), 215-238.
Adeyemi, T. (2024). Bilateral versus multilateral approaches to digital tax treaty reform. Journal of International Economic Law, 27(2), 189-212.
Ari, A. (2024). Digital taxation and the future of source-based taxation in the European Union. European Tax Studies, 15(1), 45-72.
Baker, R. (2024). Administrative capacity and digital tax enforcement in developing economies. World Tax Journal, 16(4), 334-358.
Bunn, D., Asen, E., & Enache, C. (2021). Digital taxation around the world. Tax Foundation Global Tax Policy Review, 8(2), 12-29.
Campbell, M. (2025). Judicial interpretation of digital permanent establishment rules. British Tax Review, 61(3), 278-301.
Christians, A., Cockfield, A., & Oosterhuis, P. (2017). Taxing the digital economy: Legal challenges and policy responses. Canadian Tax Journal, 65(4), 821-856.
Dagan, T. (2020). Source taxation in the digital age: Principles and practice. Virginia Tax Review, 39(3), 451-492.
Davis, P. (2025). Gross basis versus net basis digital taxation for developing countries. Bulletin for International Taxation, 79(2), 88-107.
Devereux, M. P., & Vella, J. (2021). Implications of digitalization for international corporate tax reform. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 37(4), 775-801.
Devereux, M. P., Auerbach, A. J., Keen, M., Oosterhuis, P., Schön, W., & Vella, J. (2021). Taxing the digital economy: The OECD pillar one and two proposals. Oxford University Press.
Eze, C. (2025). The African Tax Administration Forum and digital tax coordination. African Journal of Tax Law, 9(1), 56-81.
Fernandez, L. (2024). Capacity building for digital tax enforcement in lower-income countries. Intertax, 52(5), 412-436.
Garcia, R. (2025). Unilateral digital services taxes: A comparative analysis. Florida Tax Review, 24(1), 112-145.
Grinberg, I. (2021). The digital economy and international tax coordination. Georgetown Law Journal, 109(5), 1123-1186.
Hassan, K. (2026). Source versus residence taxation in the digital era. Harvard International Law Journal, 67(1), 78-112.
Hearson, M. (2021). Imposing standards: The north-south dimension to global tax politics. Cornell University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501756009
Hernandez, M., & Simmons, R. (2021). Fairness and administrative complexity in digital profit allocation. Berkeley Journal of International Law, 39(2), 245-284.
Ibrahim, A. (2025). The United Nations approach to digital tax governance. Journal of World Investment & Trade, 26(3), 345-372.
Irfan, M., Khan, Z., & Rahman, S. (2025). Digital permanent establishment and BEPS challenges: A systematic review. International Journal of Law and Management, 67(2), 189-214.
Jansen, P. (2026). The United Nations Tax Convention and developing country interests. Columbia Journal of Tax Law, 17(2), 201-238.
Khan, M., Ahmed, R., & Patel, S. (2022). Implementation barriers in digital taxation frameworks. Asia-Pacific Tax Bulletin, 28(4), 267-291.
Kofler, G., Owens, J., & Pistone, P. (2020). The digital economy and source taxation: Emerging principles. World Tax Journal, 12(3), 445-478.
Kofler, G., Pistone, P., & Schoueri, L. E. (2021). Treaty compatibility of digital services taxes. International Tax Studies, 4(2), 1-34.
Kowalski, M. (2024). Source taxation principles in bilateral treaty negotiations. European Taxation, 64(6), 245-268.
Lee, S., Park, J., & Kim, H. (2025). Legal fragmentation and digital tax disputes in the European Union. Common Market Law Review, 62(4), 987-1022.
Mohamed, F. (2024). The stalled multilateral convention for pillar one: Causes and consequences. Journal of International Taxation, 35(8), 34-59.
Murphy, R., Quinn, M., & Walsh, T. (2026). Treaty language and digital business models: An interpretive analysis. British Tax Review, 62(2), 156-183.
Nguyen, T. (2025). Institutional capacity and digital tax collection in Southeast Asia. Asian Journal of Law and Economics, 16(2), 123-148.
Nguyen, T., Patel, R., & Silva, C. (2025). Compatibility of digital permanent establishment with existing tax treaties. Melbourne Journal of International Law, 26(1), 89-118.
Nkosi, B., van der Merwe, J., & Botha, P. (2024). American participation in OECD pillar one: Prospects and challenges. South African Journal of Tax Research, 22(3), 278-305.
Okafor, O., Adebayo, K., & Mensah, T. (2026). Political economy of digital tax negotiations in Africa. Journal of African Law, 70(2), 189-216.
Olsen, K., Bergmann, M., & Larsen, S. (2025). National digital services taxes versus pillar one: A legal analysis. Nordic Tax Journal, 13(1), 45-72.
Paul, J., Singh, G., & Sharma, R. (2023). Digital taxation research: A bibliometric analysis of emerging trends. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 48(2), 100-124.
Petrov, D., Ivanova, E., & Smirnov, A. (2024). Profitability thresholds and tax avoidance in pillar one. Eurasian Tax Review, 11(2), 134-161.
Purnamasari, D. (2024). Administrative enforcement of digital tax rules in developing countries. Indonesian Journal of International Law, 21(3), 412-441.
Quinones, N. (2023). The removal of user value creation from pillar one negotiations. Bulletin for International Taxation, 77(6), 312-335.
Ribeiro, F., Santos, M., & Costa, P. (2026). OECD impact assessment of pillar one: A critical evaluation. Portuguese Tax Law Review, 18(1), 67-94.
Rossi, G., Bianchi, A., & Romano, L. (2025). Profit reallocation under pillar one: Mechanisms and outcomes. Italian Journal of Tax Law, 14(2), 189-218.
Schmidt, H., Wagner, K., & Fischer, J. (2024). The European Union's common digital tax framework: Progress and obstacles. German Tax Law Review, 31(4), 345-374.
Silva, J., Almeida, P., & Costa, R. (2026). Political will and digital tax reform in the European Union. Portuguese Economic Journal, 25(1), 78-105.
Taylor, B., Wilson, J., & Adams, K. (2025). Revenue thresholds versus user data collection: Competing digital presence standards. Canadian Tax Journal, 73(2), 267-296.
Tulakov, D. (2025). Harmonization of digital taxation rules with existing treaty frameworks. Kazakhstan Tax Law Review, 8(1), 45-72.
Vasquez, L., Mendoza, R., & Torres, P. (2026). Enforcement gaps in digital permanent establishment rules. Latin American Tax Law Review, 12(1), 89-116.
Weber, D., Kerkhof, J., & van den Hurk, H. (2025). European Commission's significant digital presence proposal: Implementation experiences. EC Tax Review, 34(3), 156-183.
Yamamoto, K., Tanaka, H., & Sato, M. (2024). Digital permanent establishment in practice: European case studies. Japanese Yearbook of International Law, 67, 234-261.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Edvardas Juchnevicius

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
