Harmonization of the Legal Framework for Online Arbitration
Abstract views: 367
/ 
PDF downloads: 244
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.154Keywords:
ADR, COVID-19 Pandemic, Online Dispute Resolution, Tashkent International Arbitration Center (TIAC), Electronic Commerce, Unilateral, Bilateral, Versatile, Model LawAbstract
Developed to resolve disputes worldwide in a digital environment, the program works only online. Unlike other court software that provides an online interface for discrete tasks, such as filling out documents online, and conducting online hearings, users of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) do not go to court for traditional requests. The program is not a technological platform designed for making court decisions, but a tool to assist the court in resolving the disputes or cases of the applicants. Dispute resolution in a digital environment allows parties to resolve disputes confidentially, quickly, at their own discretion, and impartially, and to ensure worldwide enforcement of the decision. In this regard, special attention is paid to the wide introduction of information technologies in this field.
References
Vilalta, A. E. (2010). Legal framework and harmonization of ADR/ODR methods. Journal of Law and Conflict Resolution, 2(7), 103-107. Retrieved from http://www.academicjournals.org/jlcr
European Commission. (2013). Statistics. European Commission - European Online Dispute Resolution. Retrieved February 23, 2023, from https://ec.europa.eu/consumers/odr/main/?event=main.statistics.show
Sorieul, R., Clift, J. R., & Estrella-Faria, J. A. (2001). Establishing a Legal Framework for Electronic Commerce: The Work of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL). The International Lawyer, 35(1), 107–122. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40707598
AllahRakha, N. (2024). Cybercrime and the Law: Addressing the Challenges of Digital Forensics in Criminal Investigations. Mexican Law Review, 16(2), 23–54. https://doi.org/10.22201/iij.24485306e.2024.2.18892
Rahmonkulov, H.R., et al. (2008). International private law. Textbook for higher educational institutions. TDYI Publishing House.
Kuner, C. (2009). An international legal framework for data protection: Issues and prospects. Computer Law & Security Review, 25(4), 311–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2009.03.005
Ruziyev, R.D., & Topildiyev V.R. (2011). Civil law: [Study guide]. General part. Cholpon Publishing House.
UNCITRAL. (1966). Status: UNCITRAL model law on electronic commerce (1996). United Nations Commission on International Trade Law. Retrieved February 23, 2023, from http://www.uncitral.org/uncitral/en/uncitral_texts/electronic_commerce/1996Model_status.html
AllahRakha, Naeem, Modernizing Criminal and Evidence Laws to Facilitate Tourism in Pakistan. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4707544 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4707544
Kuner, C. (2009). An international legal framework for data protection: Issues and prospects. Computer Law & Security Review, 25(4), 311–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2009.03.005
Brazil-David, R. (2011). Harmonization and delocalization of international commercial arbitration. Journal of International Arbitration, 28(5), 445–466. https://doi.org/10.54648/joia2011036
Condlin, R. J. (2017). Online dispute resolution: Stinky, repugnant, or drab? Faculty Scholarship, 1576. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/fac_pubs/1576
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Mokhinur Bakhramova
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
