Problems of Admissibility and Reliability of Metadata as Evidence


Abstract views: 133 / PDF downloads: 99

Authors

  • Balkibaeva Janagul Ismaylovna Judge of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Uzbekistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.208

Keywords:

Metadata, Digital Forensics, Civil Proceedings, Evidence Admissibility, Privacy, Cross-Border Issues, Expert Testimony

Abstract

This paper examines the challenges surrounding the admissibility and reliability of metadata as evidence in civil proceedings. It explores the legal standards, authentication issues, and technical complexities involved in presenting metadata in court. The study analyzes key legal cases, technical methodologies, and emerging technologies that impact the use of metadata as evidence. It addresses concerns such as metadata alteration, spoliation, privacy issues, and cross-border challenges. The research highlights the importance of forensic soundness, expert testimony, and proper interpretation of metadata in legal contexts. Additionally, it discusses the application of traditional evidence rules to digital information and the evolving standards for burden of proof in electronic evidence. The paper concludes by considering future challenges posed by emerging technologies and the need for ongoing legal and technical education in this rapidly evolving field.

References

AllahRakha, N. (2024). Addressing Barriers to Cross-Border Collection of E-Evidence in Criminal Investigations. International Journal of Law and Policy, 2(6), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.193 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.193

AllahRakha, N. (2024). Constitutional Safeguards for Digital Rights and Privacy. International Journal of Law and Policy, 2(4), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.172 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.172

AllahRakha, N. (2024). Cybercrime and the Legal and Ethical Challenges of Emerging Technologies. International Journal of Law and Policy, 2(5), 28–36. https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.191 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.191

AllahRakha, N. (2024). Legal analysis of the law of the republic of Uzbekistan" on payments and payment system". TSUL Legal Report International electronic scientific journal, 5(1), 38-55 DOI: https://doi.org/10.51788/tsul.lr.5.1./WAJR6426

Arkfeld, M. R. (2020). Arkfeld on electronic discovery and evidence (4th ed.). Law Partner Publishing

Carrier, B. (2003). Defining digital forensic examination and analysis tools using abstraction layers. International Journal of Digital Evidence, 1(4), 1-12

Casey, E. (2011). Foundations of digital forensics. In Digital evidence and computer crime: Forensic science, computers, and the internet (3rd ed., pp. 1-34). Academic Press

Cohen, F. (2013). Digital forensic evidence examination (5th ed.). ASP Press

European Union. (2016). General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) (Regulation (EU) 2016/679). European Union

Federal Rules of Evidence. (2020). Rule 702. U.S. Government Publishing Office

Federal Rules of Evidence. (2020). Rule 901. U.S. Government Publishing Office

Grimm, P. W., Capra, D. J., & Joseph, G. P. (2017). Authenticating digital evidence. GP Solo, 34(5), 28-32

Goodman, B., & Flaxman, S. (2017). European Union regulations on algorithmic decision-making and a 'right to explanation'. AI Magazine, 38(3), 50-57 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v38i3.2741

Gulyamov, S. S., & Rodionov, A. A. (2024). Cyber hygiene as an effective psychological measure in the prevention of cyber addictions. Psikhologiya i Pravo = Psychology and Law, 14(2), 77-91. https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2024140206 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2024140206

Gulyamov, S. S., Egamberdiev, E., & Naeem, A. (2024). Practice-oriented approach to reforming the traditional model of higher education with the application of EdTech technologies. In 2024 4th International Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning in Higher Education (TELE) (pp. 340-343). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/TELE62556.2024.10605684 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TELE62556.2024.10605684

Gulyamov, S. S., Fayziev, R. A., Rodionov, A. A., & Rustambekov, I. R. (2023). The role of information in developing ethical and accurate AI for energy systems. In Proceedings - 2023 5th International Conference on Control Systems, Mathematical Modeling, Automation and Energy Efficiency, SUMMA 2023 (pp. 226-230) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/SUMMA60232.2023.10349398

Hague Conference on Private International Law. (1970). Convention on the Taking of Evidence Abroad in Civil or Commercial Matters. HCCH

Lorraine v. Markel American Insurance Co., 241 F.R.D. 534 (D. Md. 2007)

National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2006). Guide to integrating forensic techniques into incident response (NIST Special Publication 800-86). NIST

Schatz, B. (2007). Digital evidence: Representation and assurance (PhD diss.). Queensland University of Technology

Scheindlin, S. A., & Capra, D. J. (2021). Electronic discovery and digital evidence in a nutshell (3rd ed.). West Academic Publishing

UK Ministry of Justice. (2010). Practice Direction 31B - Disclosure of Electronic Documents. UK Ministry of Justice

United States v. Lizarraga-Tirado, 789 F.3d 1107 (9th Cir. 2015)

United States v. Safavian, 435 F. Supp. 2d 36 (D.D.C. 2006)

Published

2024-08-30

How to Cite

Ismaylovna, B. J. (2024). Problems of Admissibility and Reliability of Metadata as Evidence. International Journal of Law and Policy, 2(8), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.208

Issue

Section

Articles