Problems of Admissibility and Reliability of Metadata as Evidence


Abstract views: 42 / PDF downloads: 42

Authors

  • Zhanagul Balkibayeva

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.232

Keywords:

Metadata, Digital Forensics, Civil Proceedings, Evidence Admissibility, Privacy, Cross-border Issues, Expert Testimony, Emerging Technologies

Abstract

This paper examines the challenges surrounding the admissibility and reliability of metadata as evidence in civil proceedings. It explores the legal standards, authentication issues, and technical complexities involved in presenting metadata in court. The study analyzes key legal cases, technical methodologies, and emerging technologies that impact the use of metadata as evidence. It addresses concerns such as metadata alteration, spoliation, privacy issues, and cross-border challenges. The research highlights the importance of forensic soundness, expert testimony, and proper interpretation of metadata in legal contexts. Additionally, it discusses the application of traditional evidence rules to digital information and the evolving standards for burden of proof in electronic evidence. The paper concludes by considering future challenges posed by emerging technologies and the need for ongoing legal and technical education in this rapidly evolving field.

References

AllahRakha, N. (2023). Artificial Intelligence strategy of the Uzbekistan: Policy framework, Preferences, and challenges. International Journal of Law and Policy, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.27 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.27

AllahRakha, N. (2023). Ensuring Cyber-security in Remote Workforce: Legal Implications and International Best Practices. International Journal of Law and Policy, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.43 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.43

AllahRakha, N. (2023). Exploring the Role of Block-chain Technology in Strengthening International Legal Guarantees for Investment Activity. International Journal of Law and Policy, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.37 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.37

AllahRakha, N. (2023). Legal Challenges for International Fintech Startups. International Journal of Law and Policy, 1(8). https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.148 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.148

AllahRakha, N. (2023). The impacts of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on business and its regulatory challenges. International Journal of Law and Policy, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.23 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.23

Arkfeld, M. R. (2020). Arkfeld on electronic discovery and evidence (4th ed.). Law Partner Publishing.

Carrier, B. (2003). Defining digital forensic examination and analysis tools using abstraction layers. International Journal of Digital Evidence, 1(4), 1-12.

Carrier, B. (2003). Defining digital forensic examination and analysis tools using abstraction layers. International Journal of Digital Evidence, 1(4), 1-12.

Chung, H., Park, J., Lee, S., & Kang, C. (2012). Digital forensic investigation of cloud storage services. Digital Investigation, 9(2), 81-95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diin.2012.05.015

Cohen, F. (2013). Digital forensic evidence examination (5th ed.). ASP Press.

Garrie, D. B., & Gelb, D. K. (2010). E-discovery in criminal cases: A need for specific rules. Suffolk University Law Review, 43(2), 393-416.

Goodman, B., & Flaxman, S. (2017). European Union regulations on algorithmic decision-making and a “right to explanation.” AI Magazine, 38(3), 50-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v38i3.2741

Grimm, P. W., Capra, D. J., & Joseph, G. P. (2017). Authenticating digital evidence. GP Solo, 34(5), 28-32.

Gulyamov, S. S. (2023). AI authorship and ownership of intellectual property in industrial power and control systems. In Proceedings of the 2023 5th International Conference on Control Systems, Mathematical Modeling, Automation and Energy Efficiency (SUMMA 2023) (pp. 217-221). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/SUMMA60232.2023.10349471

Gulyamov, S. S. (2024). Legal frameworks for the integration of artificial intelligence. IFMBE Proceedings, 92, 144-149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42782-4_16

Gulyamov, S. S., & Rodionov, A. A. (2024). Cyber hygiene as an effective psychological measure in the prevention of cyber addictions. Psikhologiya i Pravo (Psychology and Law), 14(2), 77-91. https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2024140206 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2024140206

Gulyamov, S. S., Fayziev, R. A., Rodionov, A. A., & Jakupov, G. A. (2023). Leveraging semantic analysis in machine learning for addressing unstructured challenges in education. In Proceedings of the 2023 3rd International Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning in Higher Education (TELE 2023) (pp. 5-7). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TELE58910.2023.10184355

Gulyamov, S. S., Fayziev, R. A., Rodionov, A. A., & Rustambekov, I. R. (2023). The role of information in developing ethical and accurate AI for energy systems. In Proceedings of the 2023 5th International Conference on Control Systems, Mathematical Modeling, Automation and Energy Efficiency (SUMMA 2023) (pp. 226-230). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/SUMMA60232.2023.10349398

Gulyamov, S. S., Rodionov, A. A., Rustambekov, I. R., & Yakubov, A. N. (2023). The growing significance of cyber law professionals in higher education: Effective learning strategies and innovative approaches. In Proceedings of the 2023 3rd International Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning in Higher Education (TELE 2023) (pp. 117-119). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TELE58910.2023.10184186

Patel, M. (2024). Legal and Technical Challenges of Developing Robust Traceability Systems for Genetically Modified Organisms. International Journal of Law and Policy, 2(6), 23–33. https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.195 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.195

Schatz, B. (2007). Digital evidence: Representation and assurance (Doctoral dissertation). Queensland University of Technology.

Scheindlin, S. A., & Capra, D. J. (2021). Electronic discovery and digital evidence in a nutshell (3rd ed.). West Academic Publishing.

Shahzady, R. (2024). The Role of Social-Media for Micro-Entrepreneurship of Young Startups. International Journal of Law and Policy, 2(6), 10–22. https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.194 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.194

Turdialiev, M. (2024). Navigating the Maze: AI and Automated Decision-Making Systems in Private International Law. International Journal of Law and Policy, 2(7), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.198 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.198

Yakubova, M. (2024). The Legal Challenges of Regulating AI in Cybersecurity: A Comparative Analysis of Uzbekistan and Global Approaches. International Journal of Law and Policy, 2(7), 7–10. https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.202 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.202

Downloads

Published

2024-10-30

How to Cite

Balkibayeva, Z. (2024). Problems of Admissibility and Reliability of Metadata as Evidence. International Journal of Law and Policy, 2(10), 48–58. https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.232

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 10 (2024)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Zhanagul Balkibayeva

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.