Environmental Federalism in India: Constitutional Mandates & Institutional Mechanisms
Abstract views: 115
/ 
PDF downloads: 49
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.373Keywords:
Federalism, Indian Constitution, Decentralization, Centralization, Environmental Federalism, Center- State RelationsAbstract
Environmental federalism refers to the division of powers and responsibilities for environmental governance between different levels of government in a federal system. In India, environmental federalism is uniquely shaped by the Constitutional framework, which establishes a quasi-federal structure with a strong Center, yet allocates certain environmental responsibilities across both Union and State governments. The Constitution of India, though initially silent on environmental issues, has evolved through amendments and judicial interpretations to accommodate environmental protection as a key governance priority. The 42nd Amendment Act, 1976 was a watershed moment, which brought environment-related subjects into the Concurrent List (List III), enabling both the Center and States to legislate on environmental matters. Additionally, Article 48A (Directive Principles of State Policy) and Article 51A(g) (Fundamental Duties) mandate the protection and improvement of the environment. This paper critically examines the constitutional and institutional dynamics of environmental federalism in India, highlighting its strengths, gaps, and the need for a more cooperative federal approach to tackle contemporary environmental challenges such as climate change, pollution, and biodiversity loss.
References
Agarwal, Anil., Narain, Sunita., & Sharma, Anju. (1999). Green politics. Centre for Science and Environment.
Austin, Granville. (2004). The Indian Constitution: cornerstone of a nation. Oxford University Press.
Bhagawati, P., & Dey, P. (2024). Environmental Constitutionalism in India: A Review. Ecology, Environment and Conservation, 30(02), 925–929. https://doi.org/10.53550/EEC.2024.v30i02.083 DOI: https://doi.org/10.53550/EEC.2024.v30i02.083
BHAGWATI, J. (2000). On thinking clearly about the linkage between trade and the environment. Environment and Development Economics, 5(4), 483–529. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X00220287 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X00220287
Bhullar, L. (2022). Environmental Constitutionalism and Duties of Individuals in India. Journal of Environmental Law, 34(3), 399–418. https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqac010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqac010
Copeland, B. R., & Taylor, M. S. (2004). Trade, Growth, and the Environment. Journal of Economic Literature, 42(1), 7–71. https://doi.org/10.1257/002205104773558047 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/002205104773558047
Dasgupta, S., Laplante, B., Wang, H., & Wheeler, D. (2002). Confronting the Environmental Kuznets Curve. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16(1), 147–168. https://doi.org/10.1257/0895330027157 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/0895330027157
GUPTA, S. (2014). Environmental Policy and Governance in a Federal Framework: Perspectives from India. In Environmental Policies in Asia (pp. 15–42). WORLD SCIENTIFIC. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814590488_0002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814590488_0002
Hamman, E., & Blakley, J. (2025). Strategic environmental assessment in environmental law: a comparative perspective. In Comparative Environmental Law (pp. 59–80). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788971201.00013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788971201.00013
Jasanoff, S. (1993). India at the crossroads in global environmental policy. Global Environmental Change, 3(1), 32–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-3780(93)90013-B DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-3780(93)90013-B
Kunce, M., & Shogren, J. F. (2005). On interjurisdictional competition and environmental federalism. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 50(1), 212–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2004.11.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2004.11.004
Lioyd, R., & Susanne, H. R. (2001). Iconisation of Chandrababu: Sharing Sovereignty in India’s Federal Market Economy. Economic and Political Weekl, 36(18), 1541–1552.
McCarthy, M. A., Thompson, C. J., Hauser, C., Burgman, M. A., Possingham, H. P., Moir, M. L., Tiensin, T., & Gilbert, M. (2010). Resource allocation for efficient environmental management. Ecology Letters, 13(10), 1280–1289. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01522.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01522.x
Sunday, O. B., & Muhammed, S. U. (2025). Empowering African Citizen for Sustainable Environmental Governance: Envisioning a New Africa. AMPLITUDO : Journal of Science and Technology Innovation, 4(2), 140–149. https://doi.org/10.56566/amplitudo.v4i2.366 DOI: https://doi.org/10.56566/amplitudo.v4i2.366
Sunder Raj, M. S. (2022). Environmental Jurisprudence in India: A Journey Towards Attaining Eco-Centric Ideals. Revista Catalana de Dret Ambiental, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.17345/rcda3309 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17345/rcda3309
Tucker, R. P. (1992). Environmental Law and Policy in India: Cases, Materials and Statutes. By Armin Rosencranz, Shyam Divan, and Martha L. Noble. Bombay: Tripathi Private Limited, 1991. xxviii, 555 pp. $15.00. The Journal of Asian Studies, 51(4), 965–966. https://doi.org/10.2307/2059112 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2059112
Wheeler, D. (2001). Racing to the Bottom? Foreign Investment and Air Pollution in Developing Countries. The Journal of Environment & Development, 10(3), 225–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/10704965-0101003-02 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10704965-0101003-02
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mohd Shafi Bhat
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
