International Nuclear Liability Regimes and their Prospective Implementation in Uzbekistan’s Legal System


Abstract views: 22 / PDF downloads: 11

Authors

  • Sayidkomil Ibodullaev Tashkent State Universtiy of Law

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.457

Keywords:

Nuclear Civil Liability, Vienna Convention, Uzbekistan, Energy Transition, Financial Security, Operator Liability, Nuclear Insurance, Transboundary Risk

Abstract

This article examines how international nuclear civil liability regimes can be effectively implemented in Uzbekistan’s legal system as the country moves towards commercial nuclear power. It first maps the fragmented treaty architecture built around the Paris–Brussels and Vienna/CSC regimes and distils their core principles of strict and exclusive operator liability, mandatory financial security and concentrated jurisdiction. Using doctrinal and comparative methods, the study benchmarks Uzbekistan’s existing atomic energy legislation and planned reforms against the practice of selected Vienna-Convention and newcomer states. The analysis shows that accession to the Vienna Convention marks a turning point, but that detailed domestic legislation on liability limits, insurance schemes and state guarantees remains under development. The article concludes with policy options for designing a coherent, victim-oriented liability framework and outlines implications for regional cooperation and future research.

References

AllahRakha, N. (2024). Impacts of Cybercrimes on the Digital Economy. Uzbek Journal of Law and Digital Policy, 2(3), 29–36. https://doi.org/10.59022/ujldp.207 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59022/ujldp.207

AllahRakha, N. (2025). Cross-Border E-Crimes: Jurisdiction and Due Process Challenges. ADLIYA: Jurnal Hukum Dan Kemanusiaan, 18(2), 153–170. https://doi.org/10.15575/adliya.v18i2.38633 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15575/adliya.v18i2.38633

Chen, J., & Yap, I. (2025). Imaginaries of the resilient second nuclear era: Nuclear paradox resolution and a feasible atomic priesthood. Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 57(10), 103695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2025.103695 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2025.103695

McIntosh, S. (2022). Nuclear Liability and Post-Fukushima Developments. In Nuclear Law (pp. 249–269). T.M.C. Asser Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-495-2_12 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-495-2_12

N. Alhathi, A. A., Alshahrani, K. A. Y., & Al-Darwbi, A. M. M. (2024). The Legal Basis for Civil Liability in the Nuclear Field. International Journal of Religion, 5(2), 360–366. https://doi.org/10.61707/z49p3r72 DOI: https://doi.org/10.61707/z49p3r72

Nriezedi-Anejionu, C. (2024). Carbon reduction and nuclear energy policy U-turn: the necessity for an international treaty on small modular reactors (SMR) new nuclear technology. Carbon Management, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2024.2396585 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2024.2396585

Pelzer, N. (2012). International Pooling of Operators’ Funds. Nuclear Law Bulletin, 2007(1), 37–55. https://doi.org/10.1787/nuclear_law-2007-5k9gvsb1rwq1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/nuclear_law-2007-5k9gvsb1rwq1

Raff, M. (2015). The importance of reforming civil law in formerly socialist legal systems. International Comparative Jurisprudence, 1(1), 24–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icj.2015.10.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icj.2015.10.007

VARI, A., & FERENCZ, Z. (2007). RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT IN HUNGARY: CHANGING APPROACHES AND CONFLICTS. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 09(02), 185–209. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1464333207002767 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S1464333207002767

Published

2025-11-30

How to Cite

Ibodullaev, S. (2025). International Nuclear Liability Regimes and their Prospective Implementation in Uzbekistan’s Legal System. International Journal of Law and Policy, 3(11), 95–116. https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.457

Issue

Section

Articles