Africa at the Table: Reshaping Global Corporate Accountability through Treaty Law


Abstract views: 3 / PDF downloads: 0

Authors

  • Philippa Osim Inyang Nigerian Institute of International Affairs

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.462

Keywords:

Global Constitutionalism, Africa, Business and Human Rights Treaty, TWAIL, Corporate Accountability, Postcolonial Law

Abstract

This article offers a novel contribution to the literature on global constitutionalism by reinterpreting Africa’s engagement with the proposed UN treaty on business and human rights as a constitutional intervention rather than a peripheral policy role. While existing analyses often depict African participation as fragmented or reactive, this paper argues that African states are advancing a distinct normative agenda grounded in regional legal traditions, particularly the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights, and rooted in principles of solidarity, collective responsibility, and the right to development. Drawing on Third World Approaches to International Law and postcolonial constitutional theory, the article demonstrates that Africa’s regional jurisprudence articulates an alternative constitutional vision of global economic governance, one that challenges the dominance of liberal individualism and the legal insulation of transnational corporations. Through doctrinal analysis of treaty drafts, African legal instruments, and recent developments in the intergovernmental negotiations, the article reveals how African actors are reshaping global legal norms from the margins. In doing so, it repositions Africa not as a recipient of global constitutionalism but as a site of its transformation, an original and under-recognized force in rethinking corporate accountability in international law.

References

Atabongawung, T. (2021). A legally-binding instrument on business and human rights: Implications for the right to development in Africa. African Human Rights Law Journal, 21(1), 262–289.

Backer, L. C. (2011). On the evolution of the United Nations "Protect-Respect-Remedy" project: The state, the corporation and human rights in a global governance context. Santa Clara Journal of International Law, 9(1) https://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/scujil/vol9/iss1/2

Baxi, U. (2020). The future of human rights (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press India.

Besson, S. (2012). The bearers of human rights’ duties and responsibilities for human rights: A quiet (r)evolution? Human Rights Quarterly, 25(3), 569–594.

De Schutter, O. (2016). Towards a new treaty on business and human rights. Business and Human Rights Journal, 1(1), 41–67. https://doi.org/10.1017/bhj.2015.5

Deva, S. (2021). Treaty-based solutions for corporate accountability in a globalised world. In J.

Deva, S., & Bilchitz, D. (Eds.). (2013). Human rights obligations of business: Beyond the corporate responsibility to respect? Cambridge University Press.

Enneking, L. (2012). Foreign direct liability and beyond: Exploring the role of tort law in promoting international corporate social responsibility and accountability. Eleven International Publishing.

Enneking, L. (2017). Judicial remedies: The promise and perils of transnational tort litigation. In S. Deva & D. Bilchitz (Eds.), Building a treaty on business and human rights (pp. 172–174). Cambridge University Press.

Gathii, J. T. (2020). Africa and the radical origins of the right to development. TWAIL Review, 1, 28–50.

Helfer, L. R. (2008). Redesigning the European Court of Human Rights: Embeddedness as a deep structural principle of the European human rights regime. European Journal of International Law, 19(1), 125–159. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chn004

Luthango, S. (2024). Binding business to human rights. Rosa-Luxemburg-Stiftung. https://www.rosalux.de/en/news/id/52295/binding-business-to-human-rights

Maheandiran, B. (2019). France’s duty of vigilance law: The emergence of a new legal paradigm for corporate accountability. Business and Human Rights Journal, 4(1), 153.

Muchlinski, P. T. (2007). Multinational enterprises and the law (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Nash Rojas, C. (2022). The Inter-American human rights system and international human rights law: The need for a holistic approach. Human Rights Law Review, 22(4), Article ngac022. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngac022

Ruggie, J. G. (2011). Guiding principles on business and human rights: Implementing the United Nations "Protect, Respect and Remedy" framework (UN Doc. No. A/HRC/17/31). United Nations Human Rights Council. https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/documents/publications/guidingprinciplesbusinesshr_en.pdf

Ryerson, C. (2024). Shell to face constitutional claims for violating the right to a clean environment. Corporate Accountability Lab. https://corpaccountabilitylab.org/calblog/2024/1/3/shell-to-face-constitutional-claims-for-violating-the-right-to-a-clean-environment

Ryngaert, C. (2015). Jurisdiction in international law (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Seitz, K. (2023). Report on the ninth session of the open-ended intergovernmental working group on a legally binding instrument on transnational corporations and other business enterprises with respect to human rights (“treaty”). Global Policy Forum Europe; Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung. https://www.globalpolicy.org/en/publication/report-ninth-session-open-ended-intergovernmental-working-group-legally-binding

Published

2025-12-30

How to Cite

Inyang, P. O. (2025). Africa at the Table: Reshaping Global Corporate Accountability through Treaty Law. International Journal of Law and Policy, 3(12), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.462

Issue

Section

Articles