Rethinking Digital Borders to Address Jurisdiction and Governance in the Global Digital Economy
Abstract views: 879
/ 
PDF downloads: 769
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.124Keywords:
Jurisdiction, Digital Economy, Cross-Border Payments, E-governance, Legal FrameworksAbstract
Digitalization is transforming economic activities, necessitating updated legal and policy frameworks for appropriate jurisdiction and governance. The borderless nature of digital trade introduces complexities around applicable laws, taxes, responsibilities, and liabilities. This paper reviews current debates on regulating digital spaces and reimagining digital borders to support equitable governance. Doctrinal and comparative analyses examine jurisdictional complexities. Grounded Theory assess regulatory initiatives. Ambiguous jurisdiction enables large platforms to circumvent laws. Prescriptive control risks stifling innovation. Blending scope-based rules with effects-based standards can balance control and openness. Principles-based extraterritorial applications of law aligned to global accords, demarcating platforms’ responsibilities based on risk levels and impacts are suggested. It calls for cooperation advancing rights and fairness.
References
Allioui, H., & Mourdi, Y. (2023). Exploring the full potentials of IoT for better financial growth and stability: A comprehensive survey. Sensors, 23(19), 8015. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23198015
Hane-Weijman, E. (2021). Skill matching and mismatching: Labour market trajectories of redundant manufacturing workers. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 103(1), 21-38. https://doi.org/10.1080/04353684.2021.1884497
Lazarova, M., Caligiuri, P., Collings, D. G., & De Cieri, H. (2023). Global work in a rapidly changing world: Implications for MNEs and individuals. Journal of World Business, 58(1), 101365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2022.101365
Li, L. (2022). Reskilling and Upskilling the Future-ready Workforce for Industry 4.0 and Beyond. Information Systems Frontiers. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-022-10308-y
Martínez-Peláez, R., Ochoa-Brust, A., Rivera, S., Félix, V. G., Ostos, R., Brito, H., Félix, R. A., & Mena, L. J. (2023). Role of Digital Transformation for Achieving Sustainability: Mediated Role of Stakeholders, Key Capabilities, and Technology. Sustainability, 15(14), 11221. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151411221
Raposo, V. L., & Du, L. (2023). Facial recognition technology: Is it ready to be used in public health surveillance? International Data Privacy Law, ipad021. https://doi.org/10.1093/idpl/ipad021
Stahl, B. C., Antoniou, J., Bhalla, N., et al. (2023). A systematic review of artificial intelligence impact assessments. Artificial Intelligence Review, 56, 12799–12831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-023-10420-8
Sharif, A., Ranzi, M., Carbone, R., Sciarretta, G., Marino, F. A., & Ranise, S. (2022). The eIDAS Regulation: A Survey of Technological Trends for European Electronic Identity Schemes. Applied Sciences, 12(24), 12679. https://doi.org/10.3390/app122412679
Fabrègue, B. F. G., & Bogoni, A. (2023). Privacy and Security Concerns in the Smart City. Smart Cities, 6(1), 586-613. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities6010027
Power, D. J., Heavin, C., & O’Connor, Y. (2021). Balancing privacy rights and surveillance analytics: A decision process guide. Journal of Business Analytics, 4(2), 155-170. https://doi.org/10.1080/2573234X.2021.1920856
Kemppainen, L., Kemppainen, T., Kouvonen, A., Shin, Y.-K., Lilja, E., Vehko, T., & Kuusio, H. (2023). Electronic identification (e-ID) as a socio-technical system moderating migrants' access to essential public services – The case of Finland. Government Information Quarterly, 40(4), 101839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2023.101839
Campbell-Verduyn, M. (Ed.). (2017). Bitcoin and Beyond: Cryptocurrencies, Blockchains, and Global Governance (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315211909
Banaeian Far, S., Imani Rad, A., & Rajabzadeh Asaar, M. (2023). Blockchain and its derived technologies shape the future generation of digital businesses: a focus on decentralized finance and the Metaverse. Data Science and Management, 6(3), 183-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsm.2023.06.002
Juhro, S. M. (2022). Central Banking Practices in the Digital Era: Salient Challenges, Lessons, and Implications. (Eds.), (pp. 13). Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6827-2_13
Gulyás, O., & Kiss, G. (2023). Impact of cyber-attacks on the financial institutions. Procedia Computer Science, 219, 84–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.01.267
Lu, S., He, G., & Yan, H. (2022). Research on the Impact of Technological Finance on Financial Stability: Based on the Perspective of High-Quality Economic Growth. Complexity in Financial Markets, Volume 2022, Article ID 2552520. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2552520
Bellasio, J., Silfversten, E., Leverett, E., Knack, A., Quimbre, F., Blondes, E. L., Favaro, M., & Persi Paoli, G. (2020). The Future of Cybercrime in Light of Technology Developments. RAND Corporation. Retrieved from www.rand.org/t/RRA137-1
Bellasio, J., Silfversten, E., Leverett, E., Knack, A., Quimbre, F., Blondes, E. L., Favaro, M., & Persi Paoli, G. (2020). The Future of Cybercrime in Light of Technology Developments. RAND Corporation. Retrieved from www.rand.org/t/RRA137-1
Ferrag, M. A., Maglaras, L., & Benbouzid, M. (2023). Blockchain and Artificial Intelligence as Enablers of Cyber Security in the Era of IoT and IIoT Applications. Journal of Sensors, Actuators, and Networks, 12(3), 40. https://doi.org/10.3390/jsan12030040
Casino, F., Pina, C., López-Aguilar, P., Batista, E., Solanas, A., Patsakis, C. (2022). SoK: Cross-Border Criminal Investigations and Digital Evidence. Journal of Cybersecurity, 8(1), tyac014. https://doi.org/10.1093/cybsec/tyac014
Abraham, K. S. (2020). Incomplete Insurance Coverage. Connecticut Insurance Law Journal, 26. Retrieved from https://cilj.law.uconn.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/2520/2021/02/Abraham-Final-PDF.pdf
Rodríguez-Espíndola, O., Chowdhury, S., Dey, P. K., Albores, P., & Emrouznejad, A. (2022). Analysis of the adoption of emergent technologies for risk management in the era of digital manufacturing. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 178, 121562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121562
Biener, C., Eling, M., & Wirfs, J. H. (2014). Insurability of Cyber Risk: An Empirical Analysis. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance—Issues and Practice, 39(1), 1-28. Retrieved from https://www.internationalinsurance.org/sites/default/files/2018-03/Insurability%20of%20Cyber%20Risk.pdf
Baker, T., & Shortland, A. (2023). Insurance and enterprise: Cyber insurance for ransomware. Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance: Issues and Practice, 48, 275–299. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41288-022-00281-7
Tsohou, A., Diamantopoulou, V., Gritzalis, S., & Lambrinoudakis, C. (2023). Cyber insurance: state of the art, trends and future directions. International Journal of Information Security, 22(3), 737-748. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10207-023-00660-8
Balawejder, B., Dankiewicz, R., Ostrowska-Dankiewicz, A., & Tomczyk, T. (2019). The role of insurance in cyber risk management in enterprises. Humanities and Social Sciences, 26(4/2019), 19-32. https://doi.org/10.7862/rz.2019.hss.33
Andersson, F., Jordahl, H., & Josephson, J. (2019). Outsourcing Public Services: Contractibility, Cost, and Quality. CESifo Economic Studies, 65(4), 349–372. https://doi.org/10.1093/cesifo/ifz009
Jalali, M. S., & Kaiser, J. P. (2018). Cybersecurity in Hospitals: A Systematic, Organizational Perspective. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 20(5), e10059. https://doi.org/10.2196/10059
Ifeanyi-Ajufo, N. (2023). Cyber governance in Africa: at the crossroads of politics, sovereignty and cooperation. Policy Design and Practice, 6(2), 146-159. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2023.2199960
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Naeem AllahRakha
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
